meaning of the second clause in Texas

10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Foster, Jordangreen texapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016See Foster, 398 S.W.3d at 890 ; Tex. Dep’t of Pub.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co. green scotus · 1979 2 sentences 2013Royal Drug, 440 U.S. at 211 , 99 S.Ct. 1067 ; Pireno, 458 U.S. at 127 , 102 S.Ct. 3002 . 2013Royal Drug, 440 U.S. at 211 , 99 S.Ct. 1067 ; Pireno, 458 U.S. at 127 , 102 S.Ct. 3002 .	6	2013–2013
Union Labor Life Insurance v. Pireno green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 2013Royal Drug, 440 U.S. at 211 , 99 S.Ct. 1067 ; Pireno, 458 U.S. at 127 , 102 S.Ct. 3002 . 2013Royal Drug, 440 U.S. at 211 , 99 S.Ct. 1067 ; Pireno, 458 U.S. at 127 , 102 S.Ct. 3002 .	6	2013–2013
Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Simons green tex · 2004 2 sentences 2018The high court later clarified the meaning of the second requirement by stating that “[w]hat we intended in Cathey by the second requirement for actual notice was that a governmental unit have knowledge that amounts to the same notice to which it is entitled by section 101.101(a).” Simons, 140 S.W.3d at 347 . 2015In Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Simons, 140 S.W.3d 338 , 343–48 (Tex. 2004) the Texas Supreme Court clarified the meaning of the second requirement: What we intended in Cathey by the second requirement ... was that a governmental unit have knowledge that amounts to the same notice to which it is entitled by section 101.101(a).	3	2014–2018

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 15u.s.c.1011 (6) USC § 15u.s.c.1012 (6) USC § 9u.s.c.1 (6) USC § 9u.s.c.2 (6)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (2013–2018) NY 2 (1987–2007) OR 2 (2000–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance