10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Faretta v. Californiagreen1 sentence2023See Faretta, 422 U.S. at 836 (“For his technical legal knowledge, as such, was not relevant to an assessment of his knowing exercise of the right to defend himself.”). | 1 | 1 |
Moreno v. Brittany Square Associates, L.P.green1 sentence2016See Moreno v. Brittany Square Assocs., 899 S.W.2d 261 , 262–63 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, writ denied). | 1 | 1 |
Moran v. Burbinegreen1 sentence2015In Moran v. Burbine, the United States Supreme Court considered “whether a prearraignment confession preceded by an otherwise valid waiver must be suppressed either because the police misinformed an inquiring attorney about their plans concerning the suspect or because they failed to inform the suspect of the attorney’s efforts to reach him.” 475 U.S. 412, 420 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
McRae v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See McRae v. State , 152 S.W.3d 739 , 743–44 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. filed) (holding that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the results of a field sobriety test based on officer’s admitted significant errors in administering the test). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Duckworth v. Eagan
green
2 sentences2015Id., 492 U.S. at 201 , 109 S. Ct. at 2879 . 2015Id., 492 U.S. at 201 , 109 S. Ct. at 2879 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Hirschell L. Guynes and Mable Ann Guynes
green
2 sentences2009Guynes, 713 F.2d at 1192 ; Stokes v. State Farm Lloyds, Inc., No. 14-95-01094-CV, 1997 WL 96608 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997) (not designated for publication). 2009Guynes, 713 F.2d at 1192 ; Stokes v. State Farm Lloyds, Inc., No. 14-95-01094-CV, 1997 WL 96608 , at ⅜3 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997) (not designated for publication). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
United Savings Association of Texas v. Wieler
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Members Mutual Insurance Company v. Cutaia
green
2 sentences1994Id. at 281 . 1994Id. at 281 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.