Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Lee
green
2 sentences2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , 2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , | 6 | 1961–2012 |
Stanley v. Schwalby
green
2 sentences2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , 2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , | 6 | 1961–2012 |
Imperial Sugar Co. v. Cabell
green
2 sentences2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , 2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state support[ing] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 19 S.W. 264 (Tex. 1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 (1893); Imperial Sugar Co. v. Cabell, 179 S.W. 83 (Te | 6 | 1961–2012 |
State v. Lain
green
2 sentences2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , 2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed "[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state support[ing] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession." Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee , 106 U.S. 196 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby , 19 S.W. 264 (Tex. 1892), rev'd on other grounds , 147 U.S. 508 (1893); Imperial Sugar Co. v. Cabell , 179 S.W. 83 | 4 | 2009–2012 |
Whatley v. Patten
green
2 sentences2012Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , 37 L.Ed. 259 (1893); Imperial Sugar Co. v. Cabell, 179 S.W. 83 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1915, no writ); Whatley v. Patten, 10 Tex.Civ.App. 77 , 31 S.W. 60 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1895, writ refd)). 2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , | 3 | 1961–2012 |
Stanley v. Schwalby
neutral
2 sentences2012Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , 37 L.Ed. 259 (1893); Imperial Sugar Co. v. Cabell, 179 S.W. 83 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1915, no writ); Whatley v. Patten, 10 Tex.Civ.App. 77 , 31 S.W. 60 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1895, writ refd)). 2009In support, the supreme court cited what it termed “[w]ell-reasoned and authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of the courts of this state supporting] the view that a plea of sovereign immunity by officials of the sovereign will not be sustained in a suit by the owner of land having right of possession when the sovereign has neither title nor right of possession.” Id. at 581-82 (citing United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , 1 S.Ct. 240 , 27 L.Ed. 171 (1882); Stanley v. Schwalby, 85 Tex. 348 , 19 S.W. 264 (1892), rev’d on other grounds, 147 U.S. 508 , 13 S.Ct. 418 , | 3 | 1961–2012 |
Wedegartner v. Skoruppa
green
1 sentence1996The court held that the contractor had a duty of ordinary care and the issue of whether a party is an independent contractor or an agent “may be a question of fact to be determined by a jury.” See also Maryland Casualty v. Scruggs, 277 S.W. 768 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1925, writ ref'd); Ross Anglin and Son v. Brennan, 466 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1971, no writ); Wedegartner v. Skoruppa, 236 S.W.2d 216 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1951, no writ). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Ross Anglin and Son v. Brennan
green
1 sentence1996The court held that the contractor had a duty of ordinary care and the issue of whether a party is an independent contractor or an agent “may be a question of fact to be determined by a jury.” See also Maryland Casualty v. Scruggs, 277 S.W. 768 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1925, writ ref'd); Ross Anglin and Son v. Brennan, 466 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1971, no writ); Wedegartner v. Skoruppa, 236 S.W.2d 216 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1951, no writ). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Scruggs
neutral
1 sentence1996The court held that the contractor had a duty of ordinary care and the issue of whether a party is an independent contractor or an agent “may be a question of fact to be determined by a jury.” See also Maryland Casualty v. Scruggs, 277 S.W. 768 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1925, writ ref'd); Ross Anglin and Son v. Brennan, 466 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1971, no writ); Wedegartner v. Skoruppa, 236 S.W.2d 216 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1951, no writ). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cummins v. Board of Trustees of Eanes Ind. Sch. Dist.
green
1 sentence1989Dist., 468 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Civ.App. — Austin 1971, no writ), the court reversed an abatement of a teacher’s contract suit upon a plea of sovereign immunity holding that: The suit on the contract lies against the school authorities. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Gragg v. Hill
green
1 sentence1989Gregg [sic] v. Hill, 58 S.W.2d 150 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1933, er. ref.). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Spencer v. City of Seagoville
green
1 sentence1986Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Spencer v. City of Seagoville, 700 S.W.2d 953 (Tex.App.—Dallas, 1985, no writ). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
green
2 sentences1986Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Spencer v. City of Seagoville, 700 S.W.2d 953 (Tex.App.—Dallas, 1985, no writ). 1986Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Spencer v. City of Seagoville, 700 S.W.2d 953 (Tex.App.—Dallas, 1985, no writ). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
United States v. Stelter
green
2 sentences1978Accordingly we must reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals. 553 S.W.2d 227 . 1978Accordingly we must reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals. 553 S.W.2d 227 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.