Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1998–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvalegreen2 sentences2017Fox- Gibson cites Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale, which held that “a plaintiff alleging a procedural due process takings claim must establish that he was deprived of notice and an opportunity to be heard with respect to a decision affecting his property rights.” 964 S.W.2d 922, 939 (Tex. 1998). 2016Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale, 964 S.W.2d 922, 939 (Tex. 1998). | 2 | 8 |
City of Paris and Kevin Carruth v. Ranger Abbottgreen1 sentence2014See City of Paris v. Abbott, 360 S.W.3d 567, 582 (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 2011, pet. denied) (concluding that plaintiff who failed to avail himself of the procedures for appeal and opportunity to be heard on the matters at issue "cannot now assert a procedural due process takings claim"); Brown v. Univ. of Tex. Health Ctr. at Tyler, 957 S.W.2d 911, 916 (Tex. App. -- Tyler 1997 , no pet.) (agreeing that plaintiff waived his right to complain that he was denied procedural due process when he failed to attend the scheduled hearing and avail himself of the opportunity to be heard and concluding tha | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. University of Texas Health Center at Tylergreen1 sentence2014See City of Paris v. Abbott, 360 S.W.3d 567, 582 (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 2011, pet. denied) (concluding that plaintiff who failed to avail himself of the procedures for appeal and opportunity to be heard on the matters at issue "cannot now assert a procedural due process takings claim"); Brown v. Univ. of Tex. Health Ctr. at Tyler, 957 S.W.2d 911, 916 (Tex. App. -- Tyler 1997 , no pet.) (agreeing that plaintiff waived his right to complain that he was denied procedural due process when he failed to attend the scheduled hearing and avail himself of the opportunity to be heard and concluding tha | 1 | 1 |
James R. Anderson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Douglas County Dennis Nagle, Appellees/cross-Appellantsgreen1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Herrington v. County of Sonomagreen1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City of Los Angeles
green
2 sentences2015Accordingly, a 498, 507 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 , 112 plaintiff alleging a procedural due process takings claim must S.Ct. 382, 116 L.Ed.2d 333 (1991). 2015Accordingly, a 498, 507 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 , 112 plaintiff alleging a procedural due process takings claim must S.Ct. 382, 116 L.Ed.2d 333 (1991). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Anderson v. Douglas County, Minnesota
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Harper House, Inc
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Lumley v. Hogsett
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Herrington v. County of Sonoma
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Colonial Savings Ass'n v. Commissioner
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
County of Sonoma v. Herrington
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Crist v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
1 sentence1998Cf. Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). | 1 | 1998–1998 |