procedure set forth rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

procedure set forth rule in Texas

10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commissiongreen
texapp · 2004 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Howell v. Texas Workers’ Compensation Com’n, 143 S.W.3d 416, 438 (Tex.App.-Austin 2004, pet. denied).

2010Howell v. Texas Workers’ Compensation Com’n , 143 S.W.3d 416, 438 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, pet. denied).

22
McCullough v. Kitzmangreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2005–2016
2 sentences

2016See id.

2015Id.

15
Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venturegreen
tex · 2004 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See Barton Food Mart, Inc. v. Botrie, No. 03-17-00292-CV, 2018 WL 5289538 , at *5 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 25, 2018, no pet. h.) (mem. op.) (“We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion for a continuance for an abuse of discretion.”) (citing Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture, 145 S.W.3d 150, 161 (Tex. 2004)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Cameron v. Greenhill green
tex · 1979
2 sentences

2012Pursuant to the procedure set forth in rule 16.3(b), upon the filing of the recusal motion and prior to any further proceedings in this appeal, each of the challenged justices of this court considered the motions in chambers. 2 Id.

2012Id.

22012–2012

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (2005–2018) UT 3 (2011–2011) CA 3 (1961–2014) FL 2 (2007–2015) NY 2 (2010–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check