Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Amador v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Amador , 221 S.W.3d at 672 . “[T]he reasonableness of the manner in which a DWI suspect’s blood is drawn should be assayed on an objective, case-by-case basis in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the draw.” Johnston , 336 S.W.3d at 661 . 2013Amador, 221 S.W.3d at 672 . “[T]he reasonableness of the manner in which a DWI suspect’s blood is drawn should be assayed on an objective, case-by-case basis in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the draw.” Johnston, 336 S.W.3d at 661 . | 4 | 6 |
Pacheco v. Stategreen2 sentences2026Accordingly, “[s]earches justified by a valid warrant have a presumption of legality unless the opponent produces evidence rebutting the presumption of proper police conduct.” Pacheco v. State, 347 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.). 2026Accordingly, “[s]earches justified by a valid warrant have a presumption of legality 10 unless the opponent produces evidence rebutting the presumption of proper police conduct.” Pacheco v. State, 347 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnston
green
2 sentences2018“Searches justified by a valid warrant have a presumption of legality unless the opponent produces evidence rebutting the presumption of proper police conduct,” Pacheco v. State, 347 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.), and “the reasonableness of the manner in which a DWI suspect’s blood is drawn should be assayed on an objective, case-by-case basis in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the draw” regardless of whether “a blood draw is conducted pursuant to a warrant or not.” Johnston, 336 S.W.3d at 661 ; see Gray, 2017 WL 2729672 , at *2. 2013Amador , 221 S.W.3d at 672 . “[T]he reasonableness of the manner in which a DWI suspect’s blood is drawn should be assayed on an objective, case-by-case basis in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the draw.” Johnston , 336 S.W.3d at 661 . | 4 | 2011–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.