Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.green2 sentences2005See Thomas , 2 S.W.3d at 739 . 2005See Thomas, 2 S.W.3d at 739 . | 6 | 6 |
Pacheco v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Pacheco v. State , 347 S.W.3d 849, 854 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.) (holding that trial court did not err by overruling defendant’s motion to suppress results of blood draw when “medical technologist” who drew defendant’s blood testified that she followed both the hospital’s policy for drawing blood and the directives of her certification on how to draw blood). 2013See Pacheco v. State, 347 S.W.3d 849, 854 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.) (holding that trial court did not err by overruling defendant’s motion to suppress results of blood draw when “medical technologist” who drew defendant’s blood testified that she followed both the hospital’s policy for drawing blood and the directives of her certification on how to draw blood). | 2 | 2 |
City of Dallas v. Albertgreen1 sentence2019See City of Dallas, 354 S.W.3d at 375 . 7 We sustain the pertinent part of Dunn Law’s second issue. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger
green
2 sentences2005Because Walters failed to produce a scintilla of evidence to show that such rumors occurred or that they were attributable to appellees, these claims provide no evidence of conduct by the appellees that was "beyond all possible bounds of decency, atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." See Zeltwanger , 144 S.W.3d at 445 . 2005Because Walters failed to produce a scintilla of evidence to show that such rumors occurred or that they were attributable to appellees, these claims 22 provide no evidence of conduct by the appellees that was “beyond all possible bounds of decency, atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.” See Zeltwanger, 144 S.W.3d at 445 . | 6 | 2005–2005 |
Chrysler Corp. v. Schuenemann
green
1 sentence2015He and Wood agreed upon a Schuenemann, 618 S.W.2d 799 , 805 trade-in value of $7,700 for the 280-ZX. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Sobel v. Jenkins
green
1 sentence2015Walters test drove the pickup in question Jenkins, 477 S.W.2d 863 (Tex.1972); Chrysler Corp. v. and agreed to purchase it. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.