Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vander Perren v. Vander Perrengreen2 sentences2024Instead, maintenance is “designed to maintain a party at an appropriate standard of living, under the facts and circumstances of the individual case, until the party exercising reasonable diligence has reached a level of income where maintenance is no longer necessary.” Id. 2023See Vander Perren v. Vander Perren, 105 Wis. 2d 219, 230 , 313 N.W.2d 813 (1982) (maintenance “is not to be viewed as a permanent annuity,” but instead is “designed to maintain a party at an appropriate standard of living, under the facts and circumstances of the individual case, until the party exercising reasonable diligence has reached a level of income where maintenance is no longer necessary.”). | 4 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In RE MARRIAGE OF KENYON v. Kenyon
green
2 sentences2009The focus — maintaining the recipient spouse at a life-style level he or she could anticipate but for the divorce — remains the same: "[T]he goal of maintenance is to allow the parties to maintain a standard of living reasonably comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage." Id., 2004 WI 147, ¶ 37 , 277 Wis. 2d at 72 , 690 N.W.2d at 263 . 2009The focus — maintaining the recipient spouse at a life-style level he or she could anticipate but for the divorce — remains the same: "[T]he goal of maintenance is to allow the parties to maintain a standard of living reasonably comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage." Id., 2004 WI 147, ¶ 37 , 277 Wis. 2d at 72 , 690 N.W.2d at 263 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Jordan v. Jordan
neutral
2 sentences1983Jordan v. Jordan, 44 Wis. 2d 471, 475 , 171 N.W.2d 385 (1969); Tonjes v. Tonjes, 24 Wis. 2d 120, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 446 (1964). 1983Jordan v. Jordan, 44 Wis. 2d 471, 475 , 171 N.W.2d 385 (1969); Tonjes v. Tonjes, 24 Wis. 2d 120, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 446 (1964). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Tonjes v. Tonjes
green
2 sentences1983Jordan v. Jordan, 44 Wis. 2d 471, 475 , 171 N.W.2d 385 (1969); Tonjes v. Tonjes, 24 Wis. 2d 120, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 446 (1964). 1983Jordan v. Jordan, 44 Wis. 2d 471, 475 , 171 N.W.2d 385 (1969); Tonjes v. Tonjes, 24 Wis. 2d 120, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 446 (1964). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.