Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jivan v. Economy Inn & Suitesgreen2 sentences2025Jivan v. Economy Inn & Suites, 370 Ark. 414 , 260 S.W.3d 281 (2007). 2025Jivan v. Economy Inn & Suites, 370 Ark. 414 , 260 S.W.3d 281 (2007). | 1 | 4 |
Crossett School District v. Gourleygreen2 sentences2003Crossett School Dist. v. Gourley, 50 Ark.App. 1, 3 , 899 S.W.2d 482, 483 (1995) (citing 1 Arthur Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 6.30 (1994) (emphasis in original)). 2003Crossett School Dist. v. Gourley, 50 Ark.App. 1, 3 , 899 S.W.2d 482, 483 (1995) (citing 1 Arthur Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 6.30 (1994) (emphasis in original)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. Angus
green
2 sentences2007The supreme court employed an increased-risk analysis, discussing that Nimisha was expected to reside on the premises and, as a residential employee of the hotel, the condition of living at the hotel “intensified the risk of injury due to extraordinary natural causes.” See Deffenbaugh, 313 Ark. at 106 , 852 S.W.2d at 808 . 2007The supreme court employed an increased-risk analysis, discussing that Nimisha was expected to reside on the premises and, as a residential employee of the hotel, the condition of living at the hotel “intensified the risk of injury due to extraordinary natural causes.” See Deffenbaugh, 313 Ark. at 106 , 852 S.W.2d at 808 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Odd Jobs & More & Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Reid
green
1 sentence2017Odd Jobs & More v. Reid, 2011 Ark. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. Angus
green
2 sentences2007Workers’ Compensation Commission affirmed; court of appeals reversed. 1 The court of appeals relied upon the positional-risk doctrine, rather than the increased-risk doctrine, in Deffenbaugh Industries v. Angus, 39 Ark. 2007App. 24 , 832 S.W.2d 869 (1992). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Parrish Esso Service Center v. Adams
green
2 sentences1993In Parrish Esso Service Center v. Adams, 237 Ark. 560 , 374 S.W.2d 468 (1964), this court applied the increased risk doctrine to compensate a claimant who was injured at work by a gust of wind which picked him up, carried him approximately 7 5 feet and dropped him on a concrete apron. 1993In Parrish Esso Service Center v. Adams, 237 Ark. 560 , 374 S.W.2d 468 (1964), this court applied the increased risk doctrine to compensate a claimant who was injured at work by a gust of wind which picked him up, carried him approximately 7 5 feet and dropped him on a concrete apron. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.