9 California opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchangegreen2 sentences1988Exchange (1978) 21 Cal.3d 910, 932-933 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 389 , 582 P.2d 980 ].)” When a motion for new trial is granted on the ground of excessive damages, the order should specify the evidence which required a smaller verdict. 1988Exchange (1978) 21 Cal.3d 910, 932-933 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 389 , 582 P.2d 980 ].)” When a motion for new trial is granted on the ground of excessive damages, the order should specify the evidence which required a smaller verdict. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Hillgreen2 sentences1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile 1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile | 1 | 1 |
People v. Chaversgreen2 sentences1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile 1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile | 1 | 1 |
People v. Laursengreen2 sentences1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile 1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile | 1 | 1 |
Emslie v. State Bargreen2 sentences1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile 1985(People v. Chavers (1983) 33 Cal.3d 462, 468-469 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 658 P.2d 96 ]; People v. Hill (1974) 12 Cal.3d 731, 749-753 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; Emslie v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 210, 223 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 520 P.2d 991 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201-202 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].) 5 Its relevance becomes apparent when one considers the practical rationale for the Ross rule as explained by the court: “The practical considerations that justify a warrantless search of an automobile continue to apply until the entire search of the automobile | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nosal-Tabor v. Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center
green
2 sentences2019Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) A defendant may make this showing by demonstrating that the plaintiff cannot establish one or more elements of all of his or her causes of action, or that the defendant has a complete defense to each cause of action. [Citation.] "In reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the reviewing court makes ' "an independent assessment of the correctness of the trial court's ruling, applying the same legal standard as the trial court in determining whether there are any genuine issues of material fact or whether the moving party is entitled to judgme 2019Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) A defendant may make this showing by demonstrating that the plaintiff cannot establish one or more elements of all of his or her causes of action, or that the defendant has a complete defense to each cause of action. [Citation.] "In reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the reviewing court makes ' "an independent assessment of the correctness of the trial court's ruling, applying the same legal standard as the trial court in determining whether there are any genuine issues of material fact or whether the moving party is entitled to judgme | 2 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Superior Court (Romero)
green
2 sentences2025Acknowledging the harm he had caused, Ross argued that reduction of his sentence was warranted based on his mental state and life circumstances at the time he committed the offense, his rehabilitation efforts over almost 30 years in prison, and changes in California’s sentencing laws.6 5 People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 . 6 Ross’s motion was based on section 1172.1 as well as section 1172.75. 2025Acknowledging the harm he had caused, Ross argued that reduction of his sentence was warranted based on his mental state and life circumstances at the time he committed the offense, his rehabilitation efforts over almost 30 years in prison, and changes in California’s sentencing laws.6 5 People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 . 6 Ross’s motion was based on section 1172.1 as well as section 1172.75. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Franks v. Delaware
green
1 sentence2025(Franks, supra, 438 U.S. at p. 171 .) 7 insufficient to trigger a Franks hearing. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Trypucko v. Clark
green
1 sentence2020(Ibid.) In Trypucko v. Clark (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 , the parties entered into a written lease and Trypucko provided the security deposit to Clark as required under the lease. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Ross v. Kish
green
1 sentence2020But unlike Abrolat, that defendant “failed to make any showing he would comply in the future, failed to appear at the motion for terminating sanctions and failed to file any opposition to the motion.” (Ross, supra, 145 Cal.App.4th at p. 200 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bliler v. Covenant Control Committee
green
2 sentences1989We also refer to Edward Ross, his wife, and Victoria, their 21-year-old daughter, collectively as the Ross defendants. [2] We note the court in Bliler v. Covenant Control Com. (1988) 205 Cal. App.3d 18 [ 252 Cal. Rptr. 50 ], at page 27, construed Civil Code section 51.3 "to include any preexisting residential development as a `senior citizen housing development' regardless of the actual purpose for which it was originally designed or constructed as long as its physical characteristics meet the requirements of the statute." [*] Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. 1989We also refer to Edward Ross, his wife, and Victoria, their 21-year-old daughter, collectively as the Ross defendants. [2] We note the court in Bliler v. Covenant Control Com. (1988) 205 Cal. App.3d 18 [ 252 Cal. Rptr. 50 ], at page 27, construed Civil Code section 51.3 "to include any preexisting residential development as a `senior citizen housing development' regardless of the actual purpose for which it was originally designed or constructed as long as its physical characteristics meet the requirements of the statute." [*] Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.