9 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zigan Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'ngreen2 sentences1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason." See State v. Franc , 165 Colo. 69 , 76 , 437 P.2d 48 , 51 , cert. denied , 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 ( 1968 ) ; see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre , 758 P.2d 175, 181 ( Colo. 1988 ) . 1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason.” See State v. Franc, 165 Colo. 69, 76 , 437 P.2d 48, 51 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968); see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre, 758 P.2d 175, 181 (Colo.1988). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences1996H At the Crim.P. 35(c) hearing on ineffective assistance of counsel, the district court refused to admit the record on appeal, 67 holding that Rodriguez’ claim did not necessitate a review of the record because our decision in Rodriguez IV, 794 P.2d 965 , foreclosed any claims of ineffective assistance based on appellate counsel’s alleged inability to raise all available issues on appeal. 1996In Rodriguez IV, 794 P.2d at 971, we noted that Heher submitted a “Partial Opening Brief’ more than quadruple the length permitted by C.A.R. 28, received several extensions of time beyond the forty days allowed by C.A.R. 31(a), and filed Rodriguez’ brief nearly two years after the case had been docketed. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Malonegreen1 sentence2025See People v. Malone, 923 P.2d 163, 166 (Colo. App. 1995) (noting that district courts must make sufficient findings concerning “the bases for the sentence imposed,” including restitution). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2000See Rodriguez, 945 P.2d at 1361-62 . 2000See Rodriguez, 945 P.2d at 1361-62 . | 1 | 1 |
Kennedy v. Stategreen1 sentence1994See United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 865 (10th Cir.1992) (where police knew that the apartment searched was rented by the consenter and that the suitcase therein belonged to defendant, the information known to the officers was insufficient to support a reasonable belief in the consenter’s authority, and the apparent authority exception to the warrant requirement is inapplicable); Kennedy v. State, 578 N.E.2d 633, 638 (Ind.1991) (search of gym bag constitutional under Rodriguez where police reasonably believed that consenting party had sufficient authority to consent to a search of | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Abel Gilberto Salinas-Canogreen1 sentence1994See United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 865 (10th Cir.1992) (where police knew that the apartment searched was rented by the consenter and that the suitcase therein belonged to defendant, the information known to the officers was insufficient to support a reasonable belief in the consenter’s authority, and the apparent authority exception to the warrant requirement is inapplicable); Kennedy v. State, 578 N.E.2d 633, 638 (Ind.1991) (search of gym bag constitutional under Rodriguez where police reasonably believed that consenting party had sufficient authority to consent to a search of | 1 | 1 |
Cowart v. Stategreen1 sentence1994See United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 865 (10th Cir.1992) (where police knew that the apartment searched was rented by the consenter and that the suitcase therein belonged to defendant, the information known to the officers was insufficient to support a reasonable belief in the consenter’s authority, and the apparent authority exception to the warrant requirement is inapplicable); Kennedy v. State, 578 N.E.2d 633, 638 (Ind.1991) (search of gym bag constitutional under Rodriguez where police reasonably believed that consenting party had sufficient authority to consent to a search of | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Cahillgreen2 sentences1982As the New Jersey Court pointed out in Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 491 , 303 A.2d 273, 282 (1973): "... the proposition discussed in Rodriguez, that a right is `fundamental' if it is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed in the constitution, is immediately vulnerable, for the right to acquire and hold property is guaranteed in the Federal and State Constitutions, and surely that right is not a likely candidate for such preferred treatment." Accord, Board of Education of the City School District, Etc. v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.C 1982As the New Jersey Court pointed out in Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 491 , 303 A.2d 273, 282 (1973): "... the proposition discussed in Rodriguez, that a right is `fundamental' if it is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed in the constitution, is immediately vulnerable, for the right to acquire and hold property is guaranteed in the Federal and State Constitutions, and surely that right is not a likely candidate for such preferred treatment." Accord, Board of Education of the City School District, Etc. v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.C | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Garcia
green
2 sentences1996After hearing counsel's arguments, the district court denied Rodriguez' motion. [59] R., v. 67 at 18-22. *290 Section 20-1-107, 8B C.R.S (1986) provides that "[i]f the district attorney is interested or has been employed as counsel in any case which it is his duty to prosecute or defend, the court ... may appoint a special prosecutor." In People v. Garcia, 698 P.2d 801 (Colo.1985), we set forth the standard for evaluating a motion to disqualify a district attorney: [T]he determination of whether a district attorney and his staff should be disqualified is a matter largely within the discretion 1996Section 20-1-107, 8B C.R.S (1986) provides that “[i]f the district attorney is interested or has been employed as counsel in any ease which it is his duty to prosecute or defend, the court ... may appoint a special prosecutor.” In People v. Garcia, 698 P.2d 801 (Colo.1985), we set forth the standard for evaluating a motion to disqualify a district attorney: [T]he determination of whether a district attorney and his staff should be disqualified is a matter largely within the discretion of the district court. | 2 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Franc
green
2 sentences1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason.” See State v. Franc, 165 Colo. 69, 76 , 437 P.2d 48, 51 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968); see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre, 758 P.2d 175, 181 (Colo.1988). 1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason.” See State v. Franc, 165 Colo. 69, 76 , 437 P.2d 48, 51 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968); see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre, 758 P.2d 175, 181 (Colo.1988). | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Maricopa By-Products, Inc. v. United States
green
2 sentences1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason." See State v. Franc , 165 Colo. 69 , 76 , 437 P.2d 48 , 51 , cert. denied , 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 ( 1968 ) ; see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre , 758 P.2d 175, 181 ( Colo. 1988 ) . 1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason.” See State v. Franc, 165 Colo. 69, 76 , 437 P.2d 48, 51 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968); see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre, 758 P.2d 175, 181 (Colo.1988). | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Jones v. United States
green
2 sentences1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason." See State v. Franc , 165 Colo. 69 , 76 , 437 P.2d 48 , 51 , cert. denied , 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 ( 1968 ) ; see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre , 758 P.2d 175, 181 ( Colo. 1988 ) . 1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason.” See State v. Franc, 165 Colo. 69, 76 , 437 P.2d 48, 51 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968); see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre, 758 P.2d 175, 181 (Colo.1988). | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Colorado v. Franc
green
2 sentences1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason." See State v. Franc , 165 Colo. 69 , 76 , 437 P.2d 48 , 51 , cert. denied , 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 ( 1968 ) ; see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre , 758 P.2d 175, 181 ( Colo. 1988 ) . 1996We will affirm the district court even when it reaches the "correct judgment for the wrong reason.” See State v. Franc, 165 Colo. 69, 76 , 437 P.2d 48, 51 , cert. denied, 392 U.S. 928 , 88 S.Ct. 2284 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1968); see also Zigan Sand & Gravel v. Cache La Poudre, 758 P.2d 175, 181 (Colo.1988). | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Clark v. Tansy
green
2 sentences1996The prosecutor should not intentionally misstate the evidence or mislead the jury as to the inferences it may draw. (b) The prosecutor should not express his or her personal belief or opinion as to the truth or falsity of any testimony or evidence or the guilt of the defendant . (c) The prosecutor should not make arguments calculated to appeal to the prejudices of the jury. (d) The prosecutor should refrain from argument which would divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence. 52 We decline to adopt the portion of Clark which holds that "the trial court has no discretion t 1996The prosecutor should not intentionally misstate the evidence or mislead the jury as to the inferences it may draw. (b) The prosecutor should not express his or her personal belief or opinion as to the truth or falsity of any testimony or evidence or the guilt of the defendant. (c) The prosecutor should not make arguments calculated to appeal to the prejudices of the jury. (d) The prosecutor should refrain from argument which would divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence. [52] We decline to adopt the portion of Clark which holds that "the trial court has no discretion | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Jones v. Barnes
green
2 sentences1996We find no error in the court’s ruling. 69 In Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 754 , 103 S.Ct. 3308, 3314 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), the United States Supreme Court held that appellate counsel’s failure to include every conceivable issue available for appeal does not amount to ineffective assistance. 1996We find no error in the court’s ruling. 69 In Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 754 , 103 S.Ct. 3308, 3314 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), the United States Supreme Court held that appellate counsel’s failure to include every conceivable issue available for appeal does not amount to ineffective assistance. | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Lujan v. Colorado State Board of Education
green
2 sentences1985In assessing whether education is a fundamental right under Colorado’s constitution in Lujan , we rejected the Rodriguez test and held that whether rights are fundamental does not necessarily depend on whether they are guaranteed explicitly or implicitly by our state constitution, but whether they “have been recognized as having a value essential to individual liberty in our society.” Lujan, 649 P.2d at 1015 n. 7. 1985In assessing whether education is a fundamental right under Colorado’s constitution in Lujan , we rejected the Rodriguez test and held that whether rights are fundamental does not necessarily depend on whether they are guaranteed explicitly or implicitly by our state constitution, but whether they “have been recognized as having a value essential to individual liberty in our society.” Lujan, 649 P.2d at 1015 n. 7. | 2 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Rodriguez
green
2 sentences1997We granted certiorari in People v. Rodriguez, 924 P.2d 1100 (Colo.App.1996), to re view the judgment of the court of appeals overturning the conviction of respondent Rodriguez for possession of a schedule I controlled substance, heroin. 1 The court of appeals reversed the district court’s denial of Rodriguez’s motion to suppress, holding that the detention of Rodriguez constituted an illegal arrest which tainted Rodriguez’s later consent to search. 1997We granted certiorari in People v. Rodriguez, 924 P.2d 1100 (Colo.App.1996), to review *1355 the judgment of the court of appeals overturning the conviction of respondent Rodriguez for possession of a schedule I controlled substance, heroin. [1] The court of appeals reversed the district court's denial of Rodriguez's motion to suppress, holding that the detention of Rodriguez constituted an illegal arrest which tainted Rodriguez's later consent to search. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
People v. Snyder
green
1 sentence1996Rather, the trial court stated: "I am not saying she can't testify, but I am just saying that [the prosecution ] then [has] a right to cross-examine her." Id. at 147 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Dixon v. Department of Services for Children
green
1 sentence1994See United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 865 (10th Cir.1992) (where police knew that the apartment searched was rented by the consenter and that the suitcase therein belonged to defendant, the information known to the officers was insufficient to support a reasonable belief in the consenter’s authority, and the apparent authority exception to the warrant requirement is inapplicable); Kennedy v. State, 578 N.E.2d 633, 638 (Ind.1991) (search of gym bag constitutional under Rodriguez where police reasonably believed that consenting party had sufficient authority to consent to a search of | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Governor v. State Treasurer
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Thompson v. Engelking
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Board of Education v. Walter
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Stuart McGuire Co. v. Forst
green
1 sentence1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
House v. Welsh
neutral
1 sentence1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Deutsch v. Commissioner
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Runck v. United States
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982As the New Jersey Court pointed out in Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 491 , 303 A.2d 273, 282 (1973): "... the proposition discussed in Rodriguez, that a right is `fundamental' if it is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed in the constitution, is immediately vulnerable, for the right to acquire and hold property is guaranteed in the Federal and State Constitutions, and surely that right is not a likely candidate for such preferred treatment." Accord, Board of Education of the City School District, Etc. v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.C | 1 | 1982–1982 |
In re Levy
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Olsen v. State Ex Rel. Johnson
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
McDaniel v. Thomas
green
2 sentences1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 1982For decisions finding that education is not a fundamental right, see McDaniel v. Thomas, 248 Ga. 632 , 285 S.E.2d 156 (1981); Board of Education of the City School Dist. of Cincinnati v. Walter, 58 Ohio St.2d 368 , 390 N.E.2d 813 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Matter of Levy, 38 N.Y.2d 653 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 13 , 345 N.E.2d 556 , appeal dismissed for want of Fed'l question, 429 U.S. 805 , 97 S.Ct. 39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 66 (1976); Olsen v. State, 276 Or. 9 , 554 P.2d 139 (1976); Thompson v. Engleking, 96 Idaho 793 , 537 P.2d 635 (1975); Milliken v. Green, 390 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.