6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Yochum v. Davisgreen2 sentences2018In its written order, the district court considered the factors set forth in Yochum v. Davis , 98 Nev. 484 , 486, 653 P.2d 1215 , 1216 (1982), and concluded that they favored denial of Rodriguez's NRCP 60 motion. 2018In its written order, the district court considered the factors set forth in Yochum v. Davis , 98 Nev. 484 , 486, 653 P.2d 1215 , 1216 (1982), and concluded that they favored denial of Rodriguez's NRCP 60 motion. | 2 | 3 |
Koger v. Stategreen2 sentences2022Cf. Koger v. State, 117 Nev. 138, 142-44 , 17 P.3d 428, 431-33 (2001) (considering the time between the warning and the interview, as well as the locale where each occurred). 6 For the foregoing reasons, the district court did not err in denying Rodriguez's motion to suppress. 2022Cf. Koger v. State, 117 Nev. 138, 142-44 , 17 P.3d 428, 431-33 (2001) (considering the time between the warning and the interview, as well as the locale where each occurred). 6 For the foregoing reasons, the district court did not err in denying Rodriguez's motion to suppress. | 1 | 1 |
Ramet v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Barnet v. State, 125 Nev. 195, 198 , 209 P.3d 268, 269 (2009) (reviewing the admission of evidence for abuse of discretion). 2015See Barnet v. State, 125 Nev. 195, 198 , 209 P.3d 268, 269 (2009) (reviewing the admission of evidence for abuse of discretion). | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Mandalay Sports Entertainment, LLCgreen2 sentences2011Turner v. Mandalay Sports Entm't, 124 Nev. 213, 221-22 , 180 P.3d 1172, 1178 (2008). 2011Turner v. Mandalay Sports Entm't, 124 Nev. 213, 221-22 , 180 P.3d 1172, 1178 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nga Bui v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company Incorporated
green
1 sentence2011Bui, 310 F.3d at 1148 . 8 As noted above, Cervantes failed to assert below that additional discovery was necessary to further explore the relationship between the Culinary Union Plan and HPN. 9 Because Rodriguez’s claim for loss of consortium is derivative of Cervantes’ claim for negligence, we also affirm summary judgment on that claim. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.