Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 2021–2023 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gattis v. Stategreen2 sentences2023The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar 27 513 U.S. at 329. 28 Id. at 330. 29 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 30 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 31 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 10 to Schlup's test.32 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate to meet the demanding ba 2023The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar 27 513 U.S. at 329. 28 Id. at 330. 29 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 30 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 31 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 10 to Schlup's test.32 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate to meet the demanding ba | 6 | 6 |
Downes v. Stategreen2 sentences2023The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar 27 513 U.S. at 329. 28 Id. at 330. 29 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 30 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 31 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 10 to Schlup's test.32 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate to meet the demanding ba 2023The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar 27 513 U.S. at 329. 28 Id. at 330. 29 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 30 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 31 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 10 to Schlup's test.32 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate to meet the demanding ba | 6 | 6 |
Lloyd v. Stategreen2 sentences2023The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar 27 513 U.S. at 329. 28 Id. at 330. 29 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 30 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 31 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 10 to Schlup's test.32 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate to meet the demanding ba 2023The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar 27 513 U.S. at 329. 28 Id. at 330. 29 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 30 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 31 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 10 to Schlup's test.32 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate to meet the demanding ba | 5 | 8 |
Schlup v. Delored2 sentences2022The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar to Schlup's test.37 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence 32 513 U.S. at 329 . 33 Id. at 330 . 34 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 35 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 36 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 37 534 A.2d at 1267 . 10 that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate 2022The third element of the Lloyd test, specifying that actual innocence cannot be satisfied by evidence which is “merely cumulative or impeaching,” is also similar to Schlup's test.37 This element embodies the principle that a body of new evidence 32 513 U.S. at 329 . 33 Id. at 330 . 34 Schlup, 513 U.S. at 332–33 (O'Connor, J., concurring). 35 534 A.2d at 1267 (emphasis added). 36 771 A.2d at 291 (emphasis added); Gattis v. State, 955 A.2d 1276, 1291 (Del. 2008). 37 534 A.2d at 1267 . 10 that goes only to the weight or credibility of that which was presented to the jury is almost never adequate | 1 | 3 |
Revel v. Stategreen1 sentence2021I’m going to talk to Eric [Lloyd], but don’t do that again.”86 Over Lloyd’s objection, the Superior Court allowed the testimony under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. 87 On appeal, Lloyd 83 Revel v. State, 956 A.2d 23, 27 (Del. 2008). 84 Phillips, 154 A.3d at 1157. 85 App. to Opening Br. at A1240 (Testimony of Dante Sykes). 86 Id. 87 Id. 21 argues that the secretary’s statement did not qualify as a present sense impression.88 We review a trial court’s decision to admit or deny evidence for abuse of discretion.89 90 “Hearsay statements are generally inadmissible.” But | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. State
neutral
2 sentences2022Dec. 16, 2020); Taylor v. State, 180 A.3d 41 , 2018 WL 655627 , at *1 (Del. 2022Dec. 16, 2020); Taylor v. State, 180 A.3d 41 , 2018 WL 655627 , at *1 (Del. | 5 | 2021–2022 |
Dickerson v. State
neutral
2 sentences2022This three-part test is the standard for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Superior Court Criminal Rule 33 established by the Delaware Supreme Court in Lloyd v. State.27 Another Delaware Supreme Court case, Downes v. State,28 held that the Lloyd standard for 24 2017 WL 6205776 , at *5 (“Nonetheless, the federal standard is helpful under these circumstances, as the Court has found little guidance for interpreting the precise meaning of new evidence in relation to a claim of actual innocence pursuant to Rule 61(d)(2)(i).”), aff'd, 195 A.3d 780 (Del. 2018) (Table). 25 State v. 2022This three-part test is the standard for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Superior Court Criminal Rule 33 established by the Delaware Supreme Court in Lloyd v. State.27 Another Delaware Supreme Court case, Downes v. State,28 held that the Lloyd standard for 24 2017 WL 6205776 , at *5 (“Nonetheless, the federal standard is helpful under these circumstances, as the Court has found little guidance for interpreting the precise meaning of new evidence in relation to a claim of actual innocence pursuant to Rule 61(d)(2)(i).”), aff'd, 195 A.3d 780 (Del. 2018) (Table). 25 State v. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Phlipot v. State
neutral
2 sentences2021On both newness and persuasiveness, Purnell states that the Lloyd line of cases in Delaware substantially aligns with Schlup and its progeny at the federal level. 2019) (Table); Phlipot v. State, 169 A.3d 351 , 2017 WL 3014434 , at *1 (Del. 2021On both newness and persuasiveness, Purnell states that the Lloyd line of cases in Delaware substantially aligns with Schlup and its progeny at the federal level. 2019) (Table); Phlipot v. State, 169 A.3d 351 , 2017 WL 3014434 , at *1 (Del. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.