economic factors (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

economic factors in Florida

9 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Buxton v. Buxtongreen
fladistctapp · 2007 · cited in 3 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2012–2023
2 sentences

2012See also Buxton v. Buxton, 963 So.2d 950, 953-56 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (holding that “[i]f the trial court concludes that a ‘supportive relationship’ exists, the trial court has the discretion to reduce or terminate the alimony obligation,” and that the economic factors enumerated in section 61.08(2) apply to modification proceedings under section 61.14(1)(b)).

2012In the fourth step, having considered the relevant economic factors, the circuit court must determine “whether to reduce or terminate the Former Wife’s alimony and, if to reduce it, by how much.” Id. at 956 .

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
King v. King green
fladistctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2023King, 82 So. 3d at 1129 .

2013Id. at 1129 .

22013–2023
Walker v. Walker green
fladistctapp · 2002
1 sentence

2004In the present case, this court directed the trial court to make several findings of fact on remand, including findings supporting the amount of alimony, findings that demonstrated whether the trial court considered the Wife's ability to support herself during and after the rehabilitative period in a manner reasonably commensurate with the marital lifestyle, and findings relating to the economic factors listed in section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes (1997). 818 So.2d at 713-14 .

12004–2004
Fla. Power & Light v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. green
fla · 1987
1 sentence

2003Thus, the issue of what effect such a limitation would have on Clay Electric's duty to exercise reasonable care was neither before the trial court, the appellate court nor this Court. [19] Florida Power & Light v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 510 So.2d 899 (Fla.1987), on which the dissent relies to support its suggestion that this Court "has previously engaged" in an economic analysis, see dissenting op. at 1204, note 24, does not apply to cases involving personal injuries.

12003–2003
Borchard v. Borchard green
fladistctapp · 1999
1 sentence

2000Instead, the court stated that it awarded the alimony to "equalize[ ] the purported income of the two sides for the transition into single life for the wife." In Borchard v. Borchard, 730 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), we approved the use of lump sum alimony as a means to assist a spouse's transition to single life, if the need was demonstrated.

12000–2000
American Auto. Ass'n, Inc. v. Tehrani green
fladistctapp · 1987
1 sentence

1997Id. [10] That the amendment in its final form was not as sweeping as the earlier draft may have been due, at least in part, to the economic analysis conducted by the House and Senate staffs.

11997–1997
Walter v. Schuler green
fla · 1965
1 sentence

1970The concepts of: (1) the constitutional mandate of just valuation, (2) the statutory requirement of full cash value, and (3) the economic standard of fair market value are “legally synonymous,” Walter v. Schuler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 81, 85-86 .

11970–1970

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 61.08 (6) FL § 61.14 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 20 (1975–2023) OR 19 (1940–2021) NY 16 (1979–2015) NJ 13 (1966–2026) TX 13 (1990–2015) IN 9 (1987–2011) FL 9 (1970–2023) IL 9 (1996–2024) NC 7 (1995–2024) SD 6 (1993–2015) WI 6 (1980–2005) LA 5 (1956–2001) GA 5 (2008–2024) PA 5 (1980–2014) DE 5 (2011–2022) MD 4 (1965–1990) OH 4 (1982–2002) MI 4 (1933–2023) NM 4 (1979–2014) WY 3 (1980–1993) MA 2 (1999–2017) AZ 2 (1917–1992) OK 2 (1957–1999) NE 2 (2002–2018) WV 2 (2013–2015) CT 2 (1995–2008) UT 2 (1984–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check