Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cherington v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Cherington , 24 So.3d at 661 . 2019See Cherington , 24 So.3d at 661 . | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Talat Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
green
1 sentence2018“Once those elements exist, there is no impediment as a matter of law to a recovery of damages for violation of section 624.155(1)(b)1[.] dating from the date of a proven violation.” Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Gutierrez v. State
green
1 sentence2012Cf. Gutierrez v. State, 860 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (finding that no evidentiary hearing was needed on Gutierrez’s claim that counsel failed to investigate an insanity defense when Gutierrez never claimed that he was insane at the time of the offenses). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Patton v. State
green
1 sentence2012The court noted that a proven claim of either intoxication or insanity would have negated the specific intent necessary for a conviction, and therefore “[a]t the very least this claim [that counsel was ineffective for failing to present either defense] should be tested at an evidentiary hearing.” Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Gavins v. State
green
1 sentence1997Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith
green
2 sentences1971Glass v. Parrish, Fla.1951, 51 So.2d 717 ; Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717 , 136 So. 878 (1931); and 52 Am.Jur.2d Malicious Prosecution § 83. 1971Glass v. Parrish, Fla.1951, 51 So.2d 717 ; Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717 , 136 So. 878 (1931); and 52 Am.Jur.2d Malicious Prosecution § 83. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Glass v. Parrish
green
1 sentence1971Glass v. Parrish, Fla.1951, 51 So.2d 717 ; Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717 , 136 So. 878 (1931); and 52 Am.Jur.2d Malicious Prosecution § 83. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
E. E. Alley Co. v. Ball
neutral
2 sentences1940Alley Co. v. Ball, 102 Fla. 1034 , 136 So. 704 , And since the evidence *58 in support of a plea can have no greater effect as a proven' defense in law than the plea under which it was offered warrants (because of the rule that the allegata and probata must correspond), a motion for a directed verdict on the ground that a plea has been' established as a defense as a matter of law, in legal effect puts in issue for a ruling by the Court thereon both the sufficiency of the plea as a matter of pleading as well as the legal sufficiency of the evidence to warrant a directed verdict on such plea. 1940Alley Co. v. Ball, 102 Fla. 1034 , 136 So. 704 , And since the evidence *58 in support of a plea can have no greater effect as a proven' defense in law than the plea under which it was offered warrants (because of the rule that the allegata and probata must correspond), a motion for a directed verdict on the ground that a plea has been' established as a defense as a matter of law, in legal effect puts in issue for a ruling by the Court thereon both the sufficiency of the plea as a matter of pleading as well as the legal sufficiency of the evidence to warrant a directed verdict on such plea. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.