Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.green2 sentences2026Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc., 114 Hawaiʻi 438, 480, 164 P.3d 696, 738 (2007) (finding that the appellants failed to demonstrate error because they "do not 4 Kama's November 22, 2023 Complaint, filed five months after the Family Court issued the June 19, 2023 Order for Protection, named, among others, the family court judge, clerk, and court reporter as defendants, and alleged that the Order for Protection represented a conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241, a deprivation of rights under color of law under 18 U.S.C. § 242, and a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights under 42 U.S.C 2026Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc., 114 Hawaiʻi 438, 480, 164 P.3d 696, 738 (2007) (finding that the appellants failed to demonstrate error because they "do not 4 Kama's November 22, 2023 Complaint, filed five months after the Family Court issued the June 19, 2023 Order for Protection, named, among others, the family court judge, clerk, and court reporter as defendants, and alleged that the Order for Protection represented a conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241 , a deprivation of rights under color of law under 18 U.S.C. § 242 , and a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights under 42 U.S | 7 | 7 |
Miyamoto v. Lumgreen2 sentences2007As previously stated, “this court is not obligated to sift through the voluminous record to verify an appellant’s inadequately documented contentions.” Lanai Co., 105 Hawai'i at 309 n. 31, 97 P.3d at 385 n. 31 (citations omitted); see also Miyamoto v. Lum, 104 Hawai'i 1 , 11 n. 14, 84 P.3d 509 , 519 n. 14 (2004) (stating that this court is not required to sift through the record for documentation of a party’s contention). 2007As previously stated, “this court is not obligated to sift through the voluminous record to verify an appellant’s inadequately documented contentions.” Lanai Co., 105 Hawai'i at 309 n. 31, 97 P.3d at 385 n. 31 (citations omitted); see also Miyamoto v. Lum, 104 Hawai'i 1 , 11 n. 14, 84 P.3d 509 , 519 n. 14 (2004) (stating that this court is not required to sift through the record for documentation of a party’s contention). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lambert v. Lua
green
1 sentence2024FOF 23; Lambert v. Lua, 92 Hawai‘i 228, 990 P.2d 126 (App. 1999) (Lambert v. Lua). 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER III. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lanai Co., Inc. v. Land Use Com'n
green
2 sentences2007As previously stated, “this court is not obligated to sift through the voluminous record to verify an appellant’s inadequately documented contentions.” Lanai Co., 105 Hawai'i at 309 n. 31, 97 P.3d at 385 n. 31 (citations omitted); see also Miyamoto v. Lum, 104 Hawai'i 1 , 11 n. 14, 84 P.3d 509 , 519 n. 14 (2004) (stating that this court is not required to sift through the record for documentation of a party’s contention). 2007As previously stated, “this court is not obligated to sift through the voluminous record to verify an appellant’s inadequately documented contentions.” Lanai Co., 105 Hawai'i at 309 n. 31, 97 P.3d at 385 n. 31 (citations omitted); see also Miyamoto v. Lum, 104 Hawai'i 1 , 11 n. 14, 84 P.3d 509 , 519 n. 14 (2004) (stating that this court is not required to sift through the record for documentation of a party’s contention). | 1 | 2007–2007 |