Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Raster v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc.green2 sentences2015See Raster v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 280 S.W.3d 120, 131 (Mo.Ct.App.2009). 2015See Raster v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 280 S.W.3d 120, 131 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). | 2 | 2 |
Schneberger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.green1 sentence2024See id. at 256-57; Schneberger, 213 N.W.2d at 916-18. 12 In sum, Columbia has failed to meet its summary-judgment burden to “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [Columbia] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Iowa R. | 1 | 1 |
Dolan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.green1 sentence2024See id. at 256-57; Schneberger, 213 N.W.2d at 916-18. 12 In sum, Columbia has failed to meet its summary-judgment burden to “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [Columbia] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Iowa R. | 1 | 1 |
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen1 sentence2024And so, they ask us to increase the award by $1865.75—the other half of the amount that the district court did not award for these services. 23 But “[i]t is a fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must ordinarily be both raised and decided by the district court before we will decide them on appeal.” Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Tina Elizabeth Lee v. State of Iowa and Polk County Clerk of Courtgreen1 sentence2024See Lee v. State, 874 N.W.2d 631, 649 (Iowa 2016) (holding that when attorney fees are available for only some claims in the proceeding, the court may award any fees “involving a common core of facts or based on related legal theories” (cleaned up)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Whitegreen1 sentence1998See State v. White, 563 N.W.2d 615, 617 (Iowa 1997) (holding that where the State *912 elects to proceed under only one part of the statute, then what the State charges is the statute for the purposes of the case). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spreitzer v. Hawkeye State Bank
green
2 sentences2025The Dostarts argue that unlike common law fraud, which requires an intent to deceive, consumer fraud can be based on reckless or potentially negligent conduct, requiring only an “intent that others rely upon the unfair practice, deception, [or] fraud.” Id. 2025The Dostarts argue that unlike common law fraud, which requires an intent to deceive, consumer fraud can be based on reckless or potentially negligent conduct, requiring only an “intent that others rely upon the unfair practice, deception, [or] fraud.” Id. | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Pauline McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Ioc Black Hawk County, Inc.
green
2 sentences2021We determined that the consumer fraud claim failed because “[i]f McKee had no contractual right to the bonus, and we have already determined she did not, then she could not have suffered an ascertainable loss of money or property when she was denied that bonus.” Id. at 532 . 2021We determined that the consumer fraud claim failed because “[i]f McKee had no contractual right to the bonus, and we have already determined she did not, then she could not have suffered an ascertainable loss of money or property when she was denied that bonus.” Id. at 532 . | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024But the error-preservation requirement protects more “than simply the interests of the opposing party.” Top of Iowa Co-op, 608 N.W.2d at 470 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.