gross disproportionality test (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

gross disproportionality test in Idaho

9 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Graziangreen
idaho · 2007 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2011–2012
2 sentences

2012An intra-and inter-jurisdictional analysis is appropriate only in the rare case where the sentence is grossly disproportionate to the crime committed. 144 Idaho 510, 517 , 164 P.3d 790, 797 (2007) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

2012An intra-and inter-jurisdictional analysis is appropriate only in the rare case where the sentence is grossly disproportionate to the crime committed. 144 Idaho 510, 517 , 164 P.3d 790, 797 (2007) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Brown green
idaho · 1992
2 sentences

2020Brown, 121 Idaho at 394 , 825 P.2d at 491 .

2020Brown, 121 Idaho at 394 , 825 P.2d at 491 .

72005–2020

Where else courts name it

TX 51 (2003–2025) CA 13 (2000–2024) IA 12 (2014–2026) PA 11 (1976–2025) SD 10 (1998–2015) ID 9 (2005–2020) AZ 5 (1992–2024) RI 3 (2004–2017) MN 3 (1999–2006) WY 2 (2003–2004) OH 2 (2007–2022) VA 2 (2008–2015) MS 2 (2022–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check