qui tam claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

qui tam claim in Illinois

9 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Graugreen
illappct · 1994 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017People v. Grau, 263 Ill.

2017People v. Grau, 263 Ill.

22
Fuller Family Holdings, LLC v. Northern Trust Co.green
illappct · 2007 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010See Fuller Family Holdings, 371 Ill.App.3d at 615 , 309 Ill.Dec. 111 , 863 N.E.2d 743 .

2010See Fuller Family Holdings, 371 Ill.App.3d at 615 , 309 Ill.Dec. 111 , 863 N.E.2d 743 .

22
Rockwell International Corp. v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 2007 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010The qui tam claim derives from Enterprise's alleged violation of the federal False Claims Act, which imposes civil liability on those who knowingly defraud the federal government by presenting and receiving payment for false or fraudulent claims. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (a)(1) (2006); see also Rockwell International Corp. v. United States, 549 U.S. 457, 463 , 127 S.Ct. 1397, 1403 , 167 L.Ed.2d 190, 200 (2007).

2010The qui tam claim derives from Enterprise's alleged violation of the federal False Claims Act, which imposes civil liability on those who knowingly defraud the federal government by presenting and receiving payment for false or fraudulent claims. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (a)(1) (2006); see also Rockwell International Corp. v. United States, 549 U.S. 457, 463 , 127 S.Ct. 1397, 1403 , 167 L.Ed.2d 190, 200 (2007).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Scachitti v. UBS Financial Services green
ill · 2005
2 sentences

2024Id. at 774 . ¶ 30 Adopting the reasoning in Vermont Agency, the Court held that a qui tam claim is a partial assignment of the State’s claim under the qui tam provisions, permitting a private person to “ ‘bring a civil action for a violation of [the Act] for the person and for the State.’ (Emphasis added.) 740 ILCS 175/4(b)(1) (West 2002).” Scachitti, 215 Ill. 2d at 508 .

2020Id. at 774 . ¶ 65 Adopting the reasoning in Vermont Agency, this court held that a qui tam claim constitutes a partial assignment of the State’s claim under the False Claims Act, permitting a private person to “ ‘bring a civil action for a violation of the [False Claims Act] for the person and for the State.’ (Emphasis added.) 740 ILCS 175/4(b)(1) (West 2002).” Scachitti, 215 Ill. 2d at 508 .

52019–2024
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens green
scotus · 2000
2 sentences

2024Id. at 774 . ¶ 30 Adopting the reasoning in Vermont Agency, the Court held that a qui tam claim is a partial assignment of the State’s claim under the qui tam provisions, permitting a private person to “ ‘bring a civil action for a violation of [the Act] for the person and for the State.’ (Emphasis added.) 740 ILCS 175/4(b)(1) (West 2002).” Scachitti, 215 Ill. 2d at 508 .

2020Id. at 774 . ¶ 65 Adopting the reasoning in Vermont Agency, this court held that a qui tam claim constitutes a partial assignment of the State’s claim under the False Claims Act, permitting a private person to “ ‘bring a civil action for a violation of the [False Claims Act] for the person and for the State.’ (Emphasis added.) 740 ILCS 175/4(b)(1) (West 2002).” Scachitti, 215 Ill. 2d at 508 .

52019–2024

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 740 ILCS 175/4 (6) IL § 720 ILCS 5/17-10.5 (4) IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-619 (4) IL § 740 ILCS 175/3 (4) IL § 740 ILCS 92/1 (4) IL § 740 ILCS 92/15 (4) IL § 740 ILCS 92/5 (4) IL § 755 ILCS 5/1-2.11 (4) USC § 11u.s.c.323 (4) USC § 35u.s.c.292 (4) IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 9 (2010–2024) CA 5 (2019–2023) NM 3 (2014–2018) OK 2 (2007–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check