Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Alexandergreen2 sentences2015We have previously held that “liberal application of the requirements of the ITCA notice statute is proper in order to avoid denying plaintiffs an opportunity to bring a claim where the purpose of the statute has been satisfied.” Brown v. Alexander, 876 N.E.2d 376, 381 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). [28] As to what constitutes substantial compliance and its purpose, our Supreme Court has recently stated: Substantial compliance with the statutory notice requirements is sufficient when the purpose of the notice requirement is satisfied. 2009"A liberal application of the notice requirements of the [Act] is proper in order to avoid denying plaintiffs an opportunity to bring a claim where the purpose of the statute has been satisfied." Id. at 381 . | 3 | 5 |
Galbreath v. City of Indianapolisgreen2 sentences2007See Galbreath v. City of Indianapolis, 253 Ind. 472, 479-80 , 255 N.E.2d 225, 229 (1970); Daugherty v. Dearborn County, 827 N.E.2d 34, 36 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied. 2007See Galbreath v. City of Indianapolis, 253 Ind. 472, 479-80 , 255 N.E.2d 225, 229 (1970); Daugherty v. Dearborn County, 827 N.E.2d 34, 36 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied. | 2 | 2 |
Daugherty v. Dearborn Countygreen2 sentences2007See Galbreath v. City of Indianapolis, 253 Ind. 472, 479-80 , 255 N.E.2d 225, 229 (1970); Daugherty v. Dearborn County, 827 N.E.2d 34, 36 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied. 2007See Galbreath v. City of Indianapolis, 253 Ind. 472, 479-80 , 255 N.E.2d 225, 229 (1970); Daugherty v. Dearborn County, 827 N.E.2d 34, 36 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied. | 1 | 2 |
Town of Knightstown v. Dudley Wainscottgreen1 sentence2020Town of Knightstown v. Wainscott, 70 N.E.3d 450, 455 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.