Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dias v. Daisy-Heddongreen2 sentences2019The court emphasized: " 'Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded; and a product bearing such a warning, which is safe for use if it is followed, is not in defective condition, nor is it unreasonably dangerous.' " Id. (quoting Dias v. Daisy-Heddon , 180 Ind. App. 657 , 662, 390 N.E.2d 222 , 225 (1979) ). [23] The court in Rushford noted that the air bag warnings in the owner's manual were adequate, the owner's manual was provided to the plaintiff, and there was no *129 claim of a modification. 2019The court emphasized: " 'Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded; and a product bearing such a warning, which is safe for use if it is followed, is not in defective condition, nor is it unreasonably dangerous.' " Id. (quoting Dias v. Daisy-Heddon , 180 Ind. App. 657 , 662, 390 N.E.2d 222 , 225 (1979) ). [23] The court in Rushford noted that the air bag warnings in the owner's manual were adequate, the owner's manual was provided to the plaintiff, and there was no *129 claim of a modification. | 2 | 6 |
Beverly O'Hare v. Merck & Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Also Known as Merck, Sharp & Dohmegreen2 sentences1979See Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., infra, and O'Hare v. Merck & Co., (8th Cir.1967) 381 F.2d 286, 291 . . 1979See Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., supra, and O’Hare v. Merck & Co. (8th Cir. 1967), 381 F.2d 286, 291 . . | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Chapman
green
1 sentence1979Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Chapman (1979), Ind.App., 388 N.E.2d 541 ; Nissen Trampoline Co. v. Terre Haute First Nat. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.