Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
L. S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. IPALCO Et Al.green2 sentences2014“First, the determination 6 of a utility’s revenue requirement is primarily an exercise in informed regulatory judgment.” Id. at 661 , 351 N.E.2d at 821 . 2014“First, the determination 6 of a utility’s revenue requirement is primarily an exercise in informed regulatory judgment.” Id. at 661 , 351 N.E.2d at 821 . | 1 | 3 |
Stoffel v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.green1 sentence2016See Garwood v. Indiana Dep’t of State Revenue, 24 N.E.3d 548 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.green1 sentence1993See Citizens Action, 612 N.E.2d at 201 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.
green
2 sentences1991Co. (1976), 167 Ind.App. 472, 478 , 339 N.E.2d 562, 568 , the Court of Appeals stated that the primary objective of rate proceedings is to establish a “level of rates and charges sufficient to permit the utility to meet its operating expenses plus a return on investment which will compensate its investors.” 4 The Court of Appeals also cited the following as a “simple mathematical formula for the expression of a utility’s total revenue requirement”: R = 0 + (V - D)r where R is the total revenue required, 0 is the operating costs, V is the gross value of the tangible and intangible property, D i 1991Co. (1976), 167 Ind.App. 472, 478 , 339 N.E.2d 562, 568 , the Court of Appeals stated that the primary objective of rate proceedings is to establish a “level of rates and charges sufficient to permit the utility to meet its operating expenses plus a return on investment which will compensate its investors.” 4 The Court of Appeals also cited the following as a “simple mathematical formula for the expression of a utility’s total revenue requirement”: R = 0 + (V - D)r where R is the total revenue required, 0 is the operating costs, V is the gross value of the tangible and intangible property, D i | 3 | 1991–2006 |
South Haven Waterworks v. Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor
green
2 sentences2017“Operating costs represent one component in the equation to determine the utility’s total revenue requirement[,]” and “[-t]he taxes paid by a utility are included within its operating costs.” Id. 2017In the absence of an “adjustment for taxes, operating expenses will be lower resulting in a lower total revenue requirement.” Id. at 654-55 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Public Service Co. of Indiana
green
2 sentences1993This Court and our Supreme Court have noted that a "simple mathematical formula for the expression of a utility's total revenue requirement" can be stated as: "R = O + (V - D) r where R is the total revenue required, O is the operating costs, V is the gross value of the tangible and intangible property, D is the accrued depreciation of the tangible and reproducible property, and r is the rate of return." Citizens Action Coalition v. PSI (1991), Ind., 582 N.E.2d 330, 336 , quoting City of Evansville v. So. 1993This Court and our Supreme Court have noted that a "simple mathematical formula for the expression of a utility's total revenue requirement" can be stated as: "R = 0 4+ (V - D) r where R is the total revenue required, O is the operating costs, V is the gross value of the tangible and intangible property, D is the accrued depreciation of the tangible and reproducible property, and r is the rate of return." Citizens Action Coalition v. PSI (1991), Ind., 582 N.E.2d 330, 836 , quoting City of Evansville v. So. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.