Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guineegreen2 sentences2020Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694, 706 , 102 S. Ct. 2099, 2106 (1982) (“A defendant is always free to Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-PL-2201 | July 20, 2020 Page 11 of 21 ignore the judicial proceedings, risk a default judgment, and then challenge that judgment on jurisdictional grounds in a collateral proceeding.”). [20] The Allen County trial court found that the Ohio court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. 2020Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694, 706 , 102 S. Ct. 2099, 2106 (1982) (“A defendant is always free to Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-PL-2201 | July 20, 2020 Page 11 of 21 ignore the judicial proceedings, risk a default judgment, and then challenge that judgment on jurisdictional grounds in a collateral proceeding.”). [20] The Allen County trial court found that the Ohio court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. | 5 | 5 |
Stidham v. Whelchelgreen2 sentences2020Id. “‘It is a bold move, but an option available to a nonresident is to ignore a pending proceeding and take the risk that a subsequent challenge to personal jurisdiction will prevail.’” Id. at 633 (quoting Stidham v. Whelchel, 698 N.E.2d 1152, 1156 (Ind. 1998)); Ins. 2014Cf. Stidham v. Whelchel, 698 N.E.2d 1152, 1156 (Ind. 1998) (“It is a bold move, but an option available to a nonresident to ignore a pending proceeding and take the risk that a subsequent challenge to personal jurisdiction will prevail.”). | 3 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Marriage of Harris v. Harris
green
2 sentences2020Id. “‘It is a bold move, but an option available to a nonresident is to ignore a pending proceeding and take the risk that a subsequent challenge to personal jurisdiction will prevail.’” Id. at 633 (quoting Stidham v. Whelchel, 698 N.E.2d 1152, 1156 (Ind. 1998)); Ins. 2020Id. “‘It is a bold move, but an option available to a nonresident is to ignore a pending proceeding and take the risk that a subsequent challenge to personal jurisdiction will prevail.’” Id. at 633 (quoting Stidham v. Whelchel, 698 N.E.2d 1152, 1156 (Ind. 1998)); Ins. | 1 | 2020–2020 |