Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coffey v. Stephensgreen1 sentence1990See Coffey v. Stephens, 3 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maurer v. J. C. Nichols Co.
neutral
2 sentences1980Nichols Co., 207 Kan. 315 , Syl. ¶ 3, 485 P.2d 174 (1971): *365 “The doctrine of equitable estoppel is based upon the principle that a person is held to a representation made or a position assumed where otherwise inequitable consequences would result to another who, having the right to do so under all the circumstances, has in good faith relied thereon.” We conclude that, in order for plaintiff to be estopped, it would have had to give some indication that it would not purchase hose from defendant in the future. 1980Nichols Co., 207 Kan. 315 , Syl. ¶ 3, 485 P.2d 174 (1971): *365 “The doctrine of equitable estoppel is based upon the principle that a person is held to a representation made or a position assumed where otherwise inequitable consequences would result to another who, having the right to do so under all the circumstances, has in good faith relied thereon.” We conclude that, in order for plaintiff to be estopped, it would have had to give some indication that it would not purchase hose from defendant in the future. | 5 | 1978–2006 |
Bowen v. Westerhaus
green
2 sentences2001In Bowen v. Westerhaus, 224 Kan. 42, 45-46 , 578 P.2d 1102 (1978), we noted: “The doctrine of equitable estoppel is based upon the principle that a person is held to a representation made or a position assumed when otherwise inequitable consequences would result to anodier who, having die right to do so under all die circumstances, has in good faidi relied diereon. [Citation omitted.] “This court has furdier said: ‘The doctrine of equitable estoppel requires consistency of conduct, and a litigant is estopped and precluded from maintaining an attitude widi reference to a transaction involved wh 2001In Bowen v. Westerhaus, 224 Kan. 42, 45-46 , 578 P.2d 1102 (1978), we noted: “The doctrine of equitable estoppel is based upon the principle that a person is held to a representation made or a position assumed when otherwise inequitable consequences would result to anodier who, having die right to do so under all die circumstances, has in good faidi relied diereon. [Citation omitted.] “This court has furdier said: ‘The doctrine of equitable estoppel requires consistency of conduct, and a litigant is estopped and precluded from maintaining an attitude widi reference to a transaction involved wh | 4 | 1980–2001 |
Browning v. Lefevre
neutral
2 sentences2006Nichols Co., 207 Kan. 315 , 485 P.2d 174 [1971].) `This court has further said: "The doctrine of equitable estoppel requires consistency of conduct, and a litigant is estopped and precluded from maintaining an attitude with reference to a transaction involved wholly inconsistent with his previous acts and business connection with such transaction." ( Browning v. Lefevre, 191 Kan. 397 , Syl. ¶ 2, 381 P.2d 524 [1963].) ". . . 2006Nichols Co., 207 Kan. 315 , 485 P.2d 174 [1971].) `This court has further said: "The doctrine of equitable estoppel requires consistency of conduct, and a litigant is estopped and precluded from maintaining an attitude with reference to a transaction involved wholly inconsistent with his previous acts and business connection with such transaction." ( Browning v. Lefevre, 191 Kan. 397 , Syl. ¶ 2, 381 P.2d 524 [1963].) ". . . | 3 | 1978–2006 |
Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. State Department of Human Resources
green
2 sentences2007Co. v. Kansas Dept. of Human Resources, 272 Kan. 265, 276 , 32 P.3d 1146 (2001). 2007Co. v. Kansas Dept. of Human Resources, 272 Kan. 265, 276 , 32 P.3d 1146 (2001). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.