Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1960–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riley v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.green1 sentence1987Riley v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 489 So.2d 931, 935 (La. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Almon v. Almon
green
1 sentence2023App. 1" Cir. 9/ 25198), 718 So. 2d 1073, 1077 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Rosell v. Esco
green
1 sentence1992Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Lambert v. Lambert
neutral
1 sentence1979Lambert v. Lambert, 286 So.2d 390 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1973). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Canter v. Koehring Company
red
1 sentence1977Canter v. Koehring, 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Norman v. State
green
2 sentences1970A manifest error is an error which is “clearly or obviously, wrong or in error,” Thompson v. Audubon Insurance Company, 101 So.2d 752 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1958) or “ ‘evident’, ‘apparent’, ‘clear’, ‘visible’, ‘unmistakable’ and ‘indiputable’ ”, Norman v. State, 69 So.2d 120 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1953), reversed on other grounds, 227 La. 904 , 80 So.2d 858 (1955). 1970A manifest error is an error which is “clearly or obviously, wrong or in error,” Thompson v. Audubon Insurance Company, 101 So.2d 752 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1958) or “ ‘evident’, ‘apparent’, ‘clear’, ‘visible’, ‘unmistakable’ and ‘indiputable’ ”, Norman v. State, 69 So.2d 120 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1953), reversed on other grounds, 227 La. 904 , 80 So.2d 858 (1955). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Norman v. State
green
1 sentence1970A manifest error is an error which is “clearly or obviously, wrong or in error,” Thompson v. Audubon Insurance Company, 101 So.2d 752 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1958) or “ ‘evident’, ‘apparent’, ‘clear’, ‘visible’, ‘unmistakable’ and ‘indiputable’ ”, Norman v. State, 69 So.2d 120 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1953), reversed on other grounds, 227 La. 904 , 80 So.2d 858 (1955). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Thompson v. Audubon Insurance Co.
neutral
1 sentence1970A manifest error is an error which is “clearly or obviously, wrong or in error,” Thompson v. Audubon Insurance Company, 101 So.2d 752 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1958) or “ ‘evident’, ‘apparent’, ‘clear’, ‘visible’, ‘unmistakable’ and ‘indiputable’ ”, Norman v. State, 69 So.2d 120 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1953), reversed on other grounds, 227 La. 904 , 80 So.2d 858 (1955). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Spiers v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1962Spiers v. Consolidated Companies, La.App., 125 So.2d 795 ; Thomas v. Mobley, La. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Thomas v. Mobley
green
1 sentence1960This principle of appellate review applies also to trials by jury, and it is further to be noted that the jury verdict herein was approved by the trial judge in his denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial (citations omitted).” Thomas v. Mobley, La.App. 1 Cir., 118 So.2d 476, 481 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Pierre v. Galloway
green
1 sentence1960Pierre v. Galloway, La.App. 1 Cir., 96 So.2d 916 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.