Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1946–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Corens v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Moreover, “[i]t is an unquestioned rule that photographs may be introduced in evidence, either in a civil or criminal proceeding, to illustrate the description of a person, place, or object so as to explain or apply the evidence.” Corens v. State, 185 Md. 561, 570 , 45 A.2d 340 (1946). 2007Moreover, “[i]t is an unquestioned rule that photographs may be introduced in evidence, either in a civil or criminal proceeding, to illustrate the description of a person, place, or object so as to explain or apply the evidence.” Corens v. State, 185 Md. 561, 570 , 45 A.2d 340 (1946). | 1 | 3 |
Cook v. Boehlgreen2 sentences2024“It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 (1947); see Sokol v. Nattans, 26 Md. 1975In Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 , 53 A. 2d 555 (1947), the Court of Appeals said: “It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” The same general proposition was stated in Taylor v. Denny, 118 Md. 124, 132 , 84 A. 369 (1912): “... [T]he right of a trustee to employ counsel and pay him out of the trust fund is thoroughly established, when the | 1 | 2 |
Sokol v. Nattansgreen1 sentence2024“It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 (1947); see Sokol v. Nattans, 26 Md. | 1 | 1 |
Sollers v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.green2 sentences1975See also Sollers v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company, 262 Md. 606, 611 , 278 A. 2d 581 (1971). 1975See also Sollers v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company, 262 Md. 606, 611 , 278 A. 2d 581 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Snowden v. State
green
2 sentences1967Snowden v. State, 133 Md. 624, 631 , 106 A. 5 . 1967Snowden v. State, 133 Md. 624, 631 , 106 A. 5 . | 2 | 1946–1967 |
State v. Tolley
green
2 sentences1986The Supreme Court of North Carolina, in State v. Tolley, 290 N.C. 349, 368-369 , 226 S.E.2d 353 (1976), set forth this principle as follows: "Whatever the basis for his decision, however, the unquestioned rule is that when the trial judge, in jury cases, contemplates the necessity of employing unusual visible security measures such as shackles, he should state for the record, out of the presence of the jury, the particular reasons therefor and give counsel an opportunity to voice objections and persuade the court that such measures are unnecessary. 1986The Supreme Court of North Carolina, in State v. Tolley, 290 N.C. 349, 368-369 , 226 S.E.2d 353 (1976), set forth this principle as follows: "Whatever the basis for his decision, however, the unquestioned rule is that when the trial judge, in jury cases, contemplates the necessity of employing unusual visible security measures such as shackles, he should state for the record, out of the presence of the jury, the particular reasons therefor and give counsel an opportunity to voice objections and persuade the court that such measures are unnecessary. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Finberg v. Robert
neutral
1 sentence1975In Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 , 53 A. 2d 555 (1947), the Court of Appeals said: “It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” The same general proposition was stated in Taylor v. Denny, 118 Md. 124, 132 , 84 A. 369 (1912): “... [T]he right of a trustee to employ counsel and pay him out of the trust fund is thoroughly established, when the | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Knapp v. Knapp
green
2 sentences1975In Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 , 53 A. 2d 555 (1947), the Court of Appeals said: “It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” The same general proposition was stated in Taylor v. Denny, 118 Md. 124, 132 , 84 A. 369 (1912): “... [T]he right of a trustee to employ counsel and pay him out of the trust fund is thoroughly established, when the 1975In Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 , 53 A. 2d 555 (1947), the Court of Appeals said: “It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” The same general proposition was stated in Taylor v. Denny, 118 Md. 124, 132 , 84 A. 369 (1912): “... [T]he right of a trustee to employ counsel and pay him out of the trust fund is thoroughly established, when the | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Taylor v. Denney
green
1 sentence1975In Cook v. Boehl, 188 Md. 581, 589 , 53 A. 2d 555 (1947), the Court of Appeals said: “It is an unquestioned rule that when a trustee in a court of equity finds it necessary to obtain legal assistance in the management of the trust estate, the court will allow him such reasonable fees as he may be required to pay in properly taking the advice and procuring the direction of counsel.” The same general proposition was stated in Taylor v. Denny, 118 Md. 124, 132 , 84 A. 369 (1912): “... [T]he right of a trustee to employ counsel and pay him out of the trust fund is thoroughly established, when the | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Kiessenbeck v. Kiessenbeck
green
2 sentences1949R. 28; Kiessenbeck v. Kiessenbeck, 145 Or. 82 , 26 P. 2d 58, 60 . *176 It is an unquestioned principle that a court of equity will refuse aid to a complainant who has acted fraudulently or gained an advantage by deceit or unfair means. 1949R. 28; Kiessenbeck v. Kiessenbeck, 145 Or. 82 , 26 P. 2d 58, 60 . *176 It is an unquestioned principle that a court of equity will refuse aid to a complainant who has acted fraudulently or gained an advantage by deceit or unfair means. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Laroque v. Candolle
neutral
1 sentence1947Laroque v. Candolle, 4 Md. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.