Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holly Lumber & Supply Co. v. Friedelgreen2 sentences1995See also Holly Lumber & Supply Co v Friedel, 271 Mich 425, 429 ; 261 NW 70 (1935). 1995See also Holly Lumber & Supply Co v Friedel, 271 Mich 425, 429 ; 261 NW 70 (1935). | 2 | 2 |
Converse v. Blumrichgreen1 sentence2012Instead of making further inquiries or using ordinary diligence, Marcy merely “kind of assumed Sears did all that.” Therefore, plaintiffs are considered to have notice of the “highly visible” gas line because “[k]nowledge of facts putting a person of ordinary prudence on inquiry is equivalent to actual knowledge of the facts which a reasonably diligent inquiry would have disclosed.”45 Because “there is no duty to warn someone of a risk of which that person is aware,”46 plaintiffs’ theory that defendant installers had a duty to warn them of the gas line necessarily fails as a matter of law.47 4 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Deputy Commissioner of Agriculture v. O. & A. Electric Co-Operative, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Moreover, “[k]nowledge of facts putting a person of ordinary prudence on inquiry is equivalent to actual knowledge [of] the facts which a reasonably diligent inquiry would have disclosed.” Deputy Comm’r of Agriculture v O & A Electric Coop, Inc., 332 Mich 713, 716 ; 52 NW2d 565 (1952). 2018Moreover, “[k]nowledge of facts putting a person of ordinary prudence on inquiry is equivalent to actual knowledge [of] the facts which a reasonably diligent inquiry would have disclosed.” Deputy Comm’r of Agriculture v O & A Electric Coop, Inc., 332 Mich 713, 716 ; 52 NW2d 565 (1952). | 5 | 1995–2018 |
In Re Thomas Estate
green
2 sentences2004This Court held that the bank would have discovered that her authority had expired if it had "conducted a reasonably diligent inquiry." Id. 2004This Court held that the bank would have discovered that her authority had expired if it had “conducted a reasonably diligent inquiry.” Id. | 3 | 2004–2005 |
People v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2002The dissent further stated that "[g]iven a reasonably diligent inquiry that seeks to discover bias, I see no legitimate reason to make voir dire an exhaustive process that examines every event in a venire member's life from the moment of birth onward...." Id. at 286 , 631 N.W.2d 1 . 2002The dissent further stated that "[g]iven a reasonably diligent inquiry that seeks to discover bias, I see no legitimate reason to make voir dire an exhaustive process that examines every event in a venire member's life from the moment of birth onward...." Id. at 286 , 631 N.W.2d 1 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.