reasonably diligent inquiry (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

reasonably diligent inquiry in Michigan

9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Holly Lumber & Supply Co. v. Friedelgreen
mich · 1935 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995See also Holly Lumber & Supply Co v Friedel, 271 Mich 425, 429 ; 261 NW 70 (1935).

1995See also Holly Lumber & Supply Co v Friedel, 271 Mich 425, 429 ; 261 NW 70 (1935).

22
Converse v. Blumrichgreen
mich · 1866 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Instead of making further inquiries or using ordinary diligence, Marcy merely “kind of assumed Sears did all that.” Therefore, plaintiffs are considered to have notice of the “highly visible” gas line because “[k]nowledge of facts putting a person of ordinary prudence on inquiry is equivalent to actual knowledge of the facts which a reasonably diligent inquiry would have disclosed.”45 Because “there is no duty to warn someone of a risk of which that person is aware,”46 plaintiffs’ theory that defendant installers had a duty to warn them of the gas line necessarily fails as a matter of law.47 4

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Deputy Commissioner of Agriculture v. O. & A. Electric Co-Operative, Inc. green
mich · 1952
2 sentences

2018Moreover, “[k]nowledge of facts putting a person of ordinary prudence on inquiry is equivalent to actual knowledge [of] the facts which a reasonably diligent inquiry would have disclosed.” Deputy Comm’r of Agriculture v O & A Electric Coop, Inc., 332 Mich 713, 716 ; 52 NW2d 565 (1952).

2018Moreover, “[k]nowledge of facts putting a person of ordinary prudence on inquiry is equivalent to actual knowledge [of] the facts which a reasonably diligent inquiry would have disclosed.” Deputy Comm’r of Agriculture v O & A Electric Coop, Inc., 332 Mich 713, 716 ; 52 NW2d 565 (1952).

51995–2018
In Re Thomas Estate green
michctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2004This Court held that the bank would have discovered that her authority had expired if it had "conducted a reasonably diligent inquiry." Id.

2004This Court held that the bank would have discovered that her authority had expired if it had “conducted a reasonably diligent inquiry.” Id.

32004–2005
People v. Johnson green
michctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2002The dissent further stated that "[g]iven a reasonably diligent inquiry that seeks to discover bias, I see no legitimate reason to make voir dire an exhaustive process that examines every event in a venire member's life from the moment of birth onward...." Id. at 286 , 631 N.W.2d 1 .

2002The dissent further stated that "[g]iven a reasonably diligent inquiry that seeks to discover bias, I see no legitimate reason to make voir dire an exhaustive process that examines every event in a venire member's life from the moment of birth onward...." Id. at 286 , 631 N.W.2d 1 .

12002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2919a (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 35 (1940–2026) MS 18 (1997–2017) MA 16 (1975–2025) OR 13 (1959–2026) MI 9 (1995–2018) CA 7 (1918–2022) CO 7 (1991–2012) PA 7 (1920–2015) MD 4 (2005–2016) AR 4 (1940–2004) WA 4 (2010–2019) NY 3 (1991–2010) WI 3 (1989–2020) IA 3 (1926–2022) ND 2 (2011–2011) NJ 2 (1927–1960) NC 2 (2013–2026) NH 2 (1992–1995) TN 2 (2006–2011) DC 2 (1976–1996) SC 2 (1970–1996) AZ 2 (2013–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check