Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cartergreen2 sentences2009See State v. Carter, 955 S.W.2d 548, 555 (Mo. banc 1997) (“The state’s alleged failure to comply with [a] discovery request is a claim of trial error, which is outside the scope of a Rule 29.15 motion. 2005Rule 29.15(a) permits a person convicted of a felony to set forth claims that the conviction and sentence “violates the constitution and laws of this state or the constitution of the United States.” However, Rule 29.15 is not a substitute for direct appeal, and this Court has held that “the state’s alleged failure to comply with [mov-ant’s] discovery request is a claim of trial error, which is outside the scope of a Rule 29.15 motion.” State v. Carter, 955 S.W.2d 548, 555 (Mo. banc 1997). | 3 | 3 |
Johnston v. Johnstongreen2 sentences2015In re Marriage of Osborne, 895 S.W.2d at 289 (citing Johnston v. Johnston, 573 S.W.2d 406, 411 (Mo.App. 1978)). 1995Johnston, 573 S.W.2d at 411 [3]. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Osbornegreen2 sentences2004Within the judgment at issue in this case, in addition to finding that Appellants were in default, the trial court indicated that the cause was “taken up and heard and submitted to the [e]ourt upon the pleadings and evidence.... ” “At the request of either party, the proceedings at the trial level should be recorded, preserved and included in the transcript on appeal where necessary to present a claim of trial error.” In re Marriage of Osborne, 895 S.W.2d 285, 289 (Mo.App.1995). 2004Within the judgment at issue in this case, in addition to finding that Appellants were in default, the trial court indicated that the cause was "taken up and heard and submitted to the [c]ourt upon the pleadings and evidence...." "At the request of either party, the proceedings at the trial level should be recorded, preserved and included in the transcript on appeal where necessary to present a claim of trial error." In re Marriage of Osborne, 895 S.W.2d 285, 289 (Mo.App.1995). | 1 | 2 |
Parker v. Arkansasgreen1 sentence1997See Schneider v. State, 787 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 882 , 111 S.Ct. 231 , 112 L.Ed.2d 186 (1990); Burgin v. State, 847 S.W.2d 836, 839 (Mo.App.1992), and State v. White, 790 S.W.2d 467, 474-75 (Mo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Whitegreen1 sentence1997See Schneider v. State, 787 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 882 , 111 S.Ct. 231 , 112 L.Ed.2d 186 (1990); Burgin v. State, 847 S.W.2d 836, 839 (Mo.App.1992), and State v. White, 790 S.W.2d 467, 474-75 (Mo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Burgin v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Schneider v. State, 787 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 882 , 111 S.Ct. 231 , 112 L.Ed.2d 186 (1990); Burgin v. State, 847 S.W.2d 836, 839 (Mo.App.1992), and State v. White, 790 S.W.2d 467, 474-75 (Mo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Schneider v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Schneider v. State, 787 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 882 , 111 S.Ct. 231 , 112 L.Ed.2d 186 (1990); Burgin v. State, 847 S.W.2d 836, 839 (Mo.App.1992), and State v. White, 790 S.W.2d 467, 474-75 (Mo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Stategreen1 sentence1975Cook v. State, 511 S.W.2d 819, 820 [2] (Mo.1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Clarke Dexter Weems
green
1 sentence2012On this point, United States v. Weems, 49 F.3d 528 (9th Cir.1995), is instructive. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.