claim of trial error (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

claim of trial error in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Johnson v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2007
2 sentences

2007See id. at 228-29 (citing Fulminante, 499 U.S. at 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. at 1264 ); Ramirez v. State, 76 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref d).

2006See id. at 228-29 (citing Fulminante , 499 U.S. at 309-10 , 111 S. Ct. at 1264 ); Ramirez v. State , 76 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref'd).

22
Arizona v. Fulminantegreen
scotus · 1991 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2007
2 sentences

2007See id. at 228-29 (citing Fulminante, 499 U.S. at 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. at 1264 ); Ramirez v. State, 76 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref d).

2007See id. at 228-29 (citing Fulminante, 499 U.S. at 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. at 1264 ); Ramirez v. State, 76 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref d).

22
Ramirez v. Stategreen
texapp · 2002 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2007
2 sentences

2007See id. at 228-29 (citing Fulminante, 499 U.S. at 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. at 1264 ); Ramirez v. State, 76 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref d).

2006See id. at 228-29 (citing Fulminante , 499 U.S. at 309-10 , 111 S. Ct. at 1264 ); Ramirez v. State , 76 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref'd).

22
Penny v. Stategreen
texapp · 1994 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1994–1995
2 sentences

1995Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, no pet.) (citing Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); and Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)); see Shepherd v. State, 884 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994, no pet.).

1994Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1994, no pet.).

22
Ex Parte Calderongreen
texcrimapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Ex parte Calderon, 309 S.W.3d 64, 71 (Tex. Crim.

11
Benavidez v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Benavidez v. State, 323 S.W.3d 179, 182-83 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) (An appellant who has established a claim of trial error is still entitled to appellate consideration of a sufficiency of the evidence claim because the relief for such a claim is greater than for a claim of trial error.). .

11
Shepherd v. Stategreen
texapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, no pet.) (citing Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); and Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)); see Shepherd v. State, 884 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994, no pet.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Gideon v. Wainwright green
scotus · 1963
1 sentence

2013Citing to Gideon , the Supreme Court in Martinez determined that a "prisoner's inability to present a claim of trial error is of particular concern when the claim is one of ineffective assistance of counsel," a right that is "a bedrock principle in our justice system." Id. at 1317 (citing Gideon , 372 U.S. at 344 ).

12013–2013
Martinez v. Ryan green
scotus · 2012
1 sentence

2013Citing to Gideon , the Supreme Court in Martinez determined that a "prisoner's inability to present a claim of trial error is of particular concern when the claim is one of ineffective assistance of counsel," a right that is "a bedrock principle in our justice system." Id. at 1317 (citing Gideon , 372 U.S. at 344 ).

12013–2013
Lyon v. Texas green
scotus · 1994
1 sentence

1995Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, no pet.) (citing Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); and Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)); see Shepherd v. State, 884 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994, no pet.).

11995–1995
Davis v. State green
texcrimapp · 1994
1 sentence

1995Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, no pet.) (citing Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); and Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)); see Shepherd v. State, 884 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994, no pet.).

11995–1995
Morris v. State green
texcrimapp · 1986
1 sentence

1995Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, no pet.) (citing Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); and Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)); see Shepherd v. State, 884 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994, no pet.).

11995–1995
Lyon v. State green
texcrimapp · 1994
1 sentence

1995Penny v. State, 880 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, no pet.) (citing Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); and Morris v. State, 749 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)); see Shepherd v. State, 884 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994, no pet.).

11995–1995
Meredith v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1916
2 sentences

1987However, for purposes of determining the adequacy of an indictment, we deem it sufficient that a fact is susceptible to establishment by judicial notice in the trial court, to obviate the need to allege that fact, under Art. 21.18, supra. As we have shown, the incorporation of the city of San Antonio is certainly susceptible to judicial notice, under the terms of Art. 1174, supra. The omission of allegation of the fact of incorporation was therefore not fatal to the indictment, by operation of Art. 21.18, supra. See Meredith v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 277 , 184 S.W. 204 (1916); Carrillo v. State,

1987However, for purposes of determining the adequacy of an indictment, we deem it sufficient that a fact is susceptible to establishment by judicial notice in the trial court, to obviate the need to allege that fact, under Art. 21.18, supra. As we have shown, the incorporation of the city of San Antonio is certainly susceptible to judicial notice, under the terms of Art. 1174, supra. The omission of allegation of the fact of incorporation was therefore not fatal to the indictment, by operation of Art. 21.18, supra. See Meredith v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 277 , 184 S.W. 204 (1916); Carrillo v. State,

11987–1987
Legg v. State green
texcrimapp · 1980
1 sentence

1987However, for purposes of determining the adequacy of an indictment, we deem it sufficient that a fact is susceptible to establishment by judicial notice in the trial court, to obviate the need to allege that fact, under Art. 21.18, supra. As we have shown, the incorporation of the city of San Antonio is certainly susceptible to judicial notice, under the terms of Art. 1174, supra. The omission of allegation of the fact of incorporation was therefore not fatal to the indictment, by operation of Art. 21.18, supra. See Meredith v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 277 , 184 S.W. 204 (1916); Carrillo v. State,

11987–1987
Oliver v. State green
texcrimapp · 1985
1 sentence

1987However, for purposes of determining the adequacy of an indictment, we deem it sufficient that a fact is susceptible to establishment by judicial notice in the trial court, to obviate the need to allege that fact, under Art. 21.18, supra. As we have shown, the incorporation of the city of San Antonio is certainly susceptible to judicial notice, under the terms of Art. 1174, supra. The omission of allegation of the fact of incorporation was therefore not fatal to the indictment, by operation of Art. 21.18, supra. See Meredith v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 277 , 184 S.W. 204 (1916); Carrillo v. State,

11987–1987
Carrillo v. State green
texcrimapp · 1978
1 sentence

1987However, for purposes of determining the adequacy of an indictment, we deem it sufficient that a fact is susceptible to establishment by judicial notice in the trial court, to obviate the need to allege that fact, under Art. 21.18, supra. As we have shown, the incorporation of the city of San Antonio is certainly susceptible to judicial notice, under the terms of Art. 1174, supra. The omission of allegation of the fact of incorporation was therefore not fatal to the indictment, by operation of Art. 21.18, supra. See Meredith v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 277 , 184 S.W. 204 (1916); Carrillo v. State,

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

AR 14 (2014–2025) IL 12 (1999–2025) MO 9 (1975–2015) TX 8 (1987–2015) PA 7 (1998–2026) IN 4 (2009–2019) CA 2 (2004–2023) MN 2 (1987–2014) MD 2 (1999–2005) LA 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check