Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Logan v. Stategreen2 sentences2019“When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Id. at 166 (citing Logan v. State, 773 So. 2d 338, 348 (Miss. 2000)). 2011“When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Wright, 958 So.2d at 166 [ (¶ 24) ] (citing Logan v. State, 773 So.2d 338, 348 [ (¶ 38) ] (Miss.2000)). | 6 | 6 |
Wright v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Additionally, when a prosecutor’s statement is not “an outright violation,” this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Wright, 958 So.2d 158, 166 (¶ 24) (Miss.2007) (citation omitted). 2011“When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Wright, 958 So.2d at 166 [ (¶ 24) ] (citing Logan v. State, 773 So.2d 338, 348 [ (¶ 38) ] (Miss.2000)). | 3 | 5 |
Jimpson v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Furthermore, “not every comment regarding the lack of any defense is automatically deemed to point toward the defense’s failure to testify.” Id. (citing Jimpson v. State, 532 So.2d 985, 991 (Miss.1998)). ¶ 29. 2011Furthermore, “not every comment regarding the lack of any defense is automatically deemed to point toward the defense’s failure to testify.” Id. (citing Jimpson v. State, 532 So.2d 985, 991 (Miss.1988)). | 2 | 4 |
Tate v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Further, “when considering whether an attorney’s comment during opening or closing statements was improper, this Court must determine ‘whether the natural and probable effect of the improper argument is to create unjust prejudice against the accused so as to result in a decision influenced by the prejudice so created.’” Anderson v. State, 62 So. 3d 927, 940 (Miss. 2011) (quoting Tate v. State, 20 So. 3d 623, 629 (Miss. 2009)). | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Further, “when considering whether an attorney’s comment during opening or closing statements was improper, this Court must determine ‘whether the natural and probable effect of the improper argument is to create unjust prejudice against the accused so as to result in a decision influenced by the prejudice so created.’” Anderson v. State, 62 So. 3d 927, 940 (Miss. 2011) (quoting Tate v. State, 20 So. 3d 623, 629 (Miss. 2009)). | 1 | 1 |
RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Kinggreen1 sentence2012Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. King, 921 So.2d 268, 272 (Miss.2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ladner v. State
green
1 sentence2019“When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Id. at 166 (citing Logan v. State, 773 So. 2d 338, 348 (Miss. 2000)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.