Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lowrygreen2 sentences1971In the absence of a statutory standard, what is a fair and reasonable time is within the discretion of the court.” State v. Lowry, 263 N.C. 536, 542 , 139 S.E. 2d 870, 875 (1965). 1971In the absence of a statutory standard, what is a fair and reasonable time is within the discretion of the court.” State v. Lowry, 263 N.C. 536, 542 , 139 S.E. 2d 870, 875 (1965). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Higginsgreen2 sentences1984See State v. Higgins, 266 N.C. 589 , 146 S.E. 2d 681 (1966) (affidavit referred to in warrant charging defendant upon information and belief with assault is not defective because affiant did not subscribe the affidavit); Alford v. McCormac, 90 N.C. 151 (1884) (affidavit is valid despite lack of affiant’s subscription if the oath was administered by one authorized to administer oaths). 1984See State v. Higgins, 266 N.C. 589 , 146 S.E. 2d 681 (1966) (affidavit referred to in warrant charging defendant upon information and belief with assault is not defective because affiant did not subscribe the affidavit); Alford v. McCormac, 90 N.C. 151 (1884) (affidavit is valid despite lack of affiant’s subscription if the oath was administered by one authorized to administer oaths). | 1 | 1 |
Lowe v. Futrellgreen2 sentences1977In the absence of a statutory requirement, ‘a motorist is required, when reasonably necessary, to blow his horn to give warning to travelers ahead.’ ” Lowe v. Futrell, 271 N.C. 550, 553 , 157 S.E. 2d 92, 95 (1967). 1977In the absence of a statutory requirement, ‘a motorist is required, when reasonably necessary, to blow his horn to give warning to travelers ahead.’ ” Lowe v. Futrell, 271 N.C. 550, 553 , 157 S.E. 2d 92, 95 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Green
green
2 sentences2005"In the absence of a statutory requirement or rule of court to the contrary, it is ordinarily not necessary to the validity of a petition that it be signed or verified." In re Green, 67 N.C.App. at 503 , 313 S.E.2d at 194 . 2005"In the absence of a statutory requirement or rule of court to the contrary, it is ordinarily not necessary to the validity of a petition that it be signed or verified." In re Green, 67 N.C.App. at 503 , 313 S.E.2d at 194 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Alford v. . McCormac
green
1 sentence1984See State v. Higgins, 266 N.C. 589 , 146 S.E. 2d 681 (1966) (affidavit referred to in warrant charging defendant upon information and belief with assault is not defective because affiant did not subscribe the affidavit); Alford v. McCormac, 90 N.C. 151 (1884) (affidavit is valid despite lack of affiant’s subscription if the oath was administered by one authorized to administer oaths). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Edwards v. Board of Education of Yancey County
green
2 sentences1983Edwards v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345 , 70 S.E. 2d 170 (1952). 1983Edwards v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345 , 70 S.E. 2d 170 (1952). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. Hollars
green
1 sentence1976(Citation omitted.)’ ” State v. Hollars, supra at 51 , 145 S.E. 2d at 313 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Guthrie v. . Gocking
neutral
2 sentences1967In the absence of a statutory requirement, “a motorist is required, when reasonably necessary, to blow his horn to give warning to travelers ahead.” Guthrie v. Gocking, 217 N.C. 476 , 8 S.E. 2d 607 . 1967In the absence of a statutory requirement, “a motorist is required, when reasonably necessary, to blow his horn to give warning to travelers ahead.” Guthrie v. Gocking, 217 N.C. 476 , 8 S.E. 2d 607 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.