Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pyco Supply Co. v. American Centennial Insurancegreen2 sentences2014Interpreting our Rules of Civil Procedure as to notice pleading, our Supreme Court has held that “notice pleading is made possible by the liberal opportunity for discovery and the other pretrial procedures established by the Rules to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues.” Pyco Supply Co., Inc., 321 N.C. at 442-43 , 364 S.E.2d at 384 . 2014Interpreting our Rules of Civil Procedure as to notice pleading, our Supreme Court has held that “notice pleading is made possible by the liberal opportunity for discovery and the other pretrial procedures established by the Rules to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues.” Pyco Supply Co., Inc., 321 N.C. at 442-43 , 364 S.E.2d at 384 . | 3 | 5 |
Sutton v. Dukegreen2 sentences2015"Under notice pleading, 'a statement of claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice of the claim asserted to enable the adverse party to answer and prepare for trial, to allow for the application of the doctrine of res judicata, and to show the type of case brought.' " Id. (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 102, 176 S.E.2d 161 , 165 (1970) ). " 'Such simplified notice pleading is made possible by the liberal opportunity for discovery and the other pretrial procedures established by the Rules to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the 2015"Under notice pleading, 'a statement of claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice of the claim asserted to enable the adverse party to answer and prepare for trial, to allow for the application of the doctrine of res judicata, and to show the type of case brought.' " Id. (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94 , 102, 176 S.E.2d 161 , 165 (1970) ). " 'Such simplified notice pleading is made possible by the liberal opportunity for discovery and the other pretrial procedures established by the Rules to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Conley v. Gibson
red
2 sentences1971Such simplified “notice pleading” is made possible by the liberal opportunity for discovery and the other pretrial procedures established by the rules to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues.’ Id. at 47-48 . 1970Such simplified ‘notice pleading’ is made possible by the liberal opportunity for discovery and the other pretrial procedures established by the Rules to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues.” Id. at 47-48 . | 2 | 1970–1971 |
De Loach v. Crowley's, Inc.
green
2 sentences1971Thus, under the federal rules ‘a case consists not in the pleadings, but in the evidence, for which the pleadings furnish the basis.’ DeLoach v. Crowley, Inc., 128 F. 2d 378 (5th Cir., 1941). 1970Thus, under the federal rules “a case consists not in the pleadings, but in the evidence, for which the pleadings furnish the basis.” DeLoach v. Crowley, Inc., 128 F. 2d 378 (5th Cir. 1941). | 2 | 1970–1971 |
Norton v. Scot. Mem'l Hosp., Inc.
green
2 sentences2024Based solely upon the allegations on the face of their complaint, [the p]laintiffs should be provided the opportunity, afforded by the Rules of Civil Procedure, to discover and “to disclose more precisely the basis of both the claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues.” The trial court’s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of [the p]laintiff’s IIED allegation against [the defendant] was premature, and is reversed. 250 N.C. App. at 400 , 793 S.E.2d at 709 (citing Pyco Supply Co., Inc. v. Am. Centennial Ins. 2024Based solely upon the allegations on the face of their complaint, [the p]laintiffs should be provided the opportunity, afforded by the Rules of Civil Procedure, to discover and “to disclose more precisely the basis of both the claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues.” The trial court’s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of [the p]laintiff’s IIED allegation against [the defendant] was premature, and is reversed. 250 N.C. App. at 400 , 793 S.E.2d at 709 (citing Pyco Supply Co., Inc. v. Am. Centennial Ins. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.