Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Craven Regional Medical Authority v. N.C. Department of Health & Human Servicesgreen2 sentences2014App. 46, 51 , 625 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2006) (“Where a party asserts an error of law occurred [in an administrative agency decision], we apply a de novo standard of review.”). 2006"Where a party asserts an error of law occurred, we apply a de novo standard of review." Id. | 1 | 2 |
Berens v. Berensgreen2 sentences2024One exception to this general rule exists “where a party asserts a privilege or immunity that directly relates to the matter to be disclosed pursuant to the interlocutory discovery order and the assertion of the privilege or immunity is not frivolous or insubstantial, the challenged order affects a substantial right and is thus immediately appealable.” Berens v. Berens, 247 N.C. 2024App. 12, 17 , 785 S.E.2d 733, 738 (2016) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Lively v. Berry
green
2 sentences2020Lively v. Berry, 187 N.C. 2020Lively v. Berry, 187 N.C. | 3 | 2009–2020 |
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. Carroll
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 659 , 599 S.E.2d at 894 . 2006Id. at 659 , 599 S.E.2d at 894 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Hammond v. Saini
green
2 sentences2016However, orders compelling discovery "where a party asserts a privilege or immunity that directly relates to the matter to be disclosed pursuant to the interlocutory discovery order and the assertion of the privilege or immunity is not frivolous or insubstantial, the challenged order affects a substantial right and is thus immediately appealable." Hammond v. Saini, 229 N.C.App. 359 , 362, 748 S.E.2d 585 , 588 (2013) aff'd, 367 N.C. 607 , 766 S.E.2d 590 (2014) (citation omitted). 2016However, orders compelling discovery "where a party asserts a privilege or immunity that directly relates to the matter to be disclosed pursuant to the interlocutory discovery order and the assertion of the privilege or immunity is not frivolous or insubstantial, the challenged order affects a substantial right and is thus immediately appealable." Hammond v. Saini, 229 N.C.App. 359 , 362, 748 S.E.2d 585 , 588 (2013) aff'd, 367 N.C. 607 , 766 S.E.2d 590 (2014) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Hammond v. Saini
green
2 sentences2016However, orders compelling discovery "where a party asserts a privilege or immunity that directly relates to the matter to be disclosed pursuant to the interlocutory discovery order and the assertion of the privilege or immunity is not frivolous or insubstantial, the challenged order affects a substantial right and is thus immediately appealable." Hammond v. Saini, 229 N.C.App. 359 , 362, 748 S.E.2d 585 , 588 (2013) aff'd, 367 N.C. 607 , 766 S.E.2d 590 (2014) (citation omitted). 2016However, orders compelling discovery "where a party asserts a privilege or immunity that directly relates to the matter to be disclosed pursuant to the interlocutory discovery order and the assertion of the privilege or immunity is not frivolous or insubstantial, the challenged order affects a substantial right and is thus immediately appealable." Hammond v. Saini, 229 N.C.App. 359 , 362, 748 S.E.2d 585 , 588 (2013) aff'd, 367 N.C. 607 , 766 S.E.2d 590 (2014) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
K2 Asia Ventures v. Trota
green
1 sentence2014K2 Asia Ventures v. Trota, 215 N.C. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.