Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Z.L.W.green2 sentences2022See generally In re K.N.L.P., 2022-NCSC-39, ¶ 26 (“We . . . have repeatedly recognized that ‘the bond between parent and child is just one of the factors to be considered under N.C.G.S. § 7B-1110(a), and the trial court is permitted to give greater weight to other factors.’ ” (quoting In re Z.L.W., 372 N.C. 432, 437 (2019)). 2022See generally In re K.N.L.P., 2022-NCSC-39, ¶ 26 (“We . . . have repeatedly recognized that ‘the bond between parent and child is just one of the factors to be considered under N.C.G.S. § 7B-1110(a), and the trial court is permitted to give greater weight to other factors.’ ” (quoting In re Z.L.W., 372 N.C. 432, 437 (2019)). | 3 | 3 |
Pearson v. Martingreen2 sentences2009See Pearson v. Martin, 319 N.C. 449, 451 , 355 S.E.2d 496, 497 (1987) (citation and ellipses omitted) (“Whenever; during the course of litigation it develops that the relief sought has been granted or that the questions originally in controversy between the parties are no longer at issue, the case should be dismissed, for courts will not entertain or proceed with a cause merely to determine abstract propositions of law.”). 2009See Pearson v. Martin, 319 N.C. 449, 451 , 355 S.E.2d 496, 497 (1987) (citation and ellipses omitted) (“Whenever; during the course of litigation it develops that the relief sought has been granted or that the questions originally in controversy between the parties are no longer at issue, the case should be dismissed, for courts will not entertain or proceed with a cause merely to determine abstract propositions of law.”). | 2 | 2 |
State v. McNeilgreen2 sentences2026See State v. McNeil, 47 N.C. App. 30, 38 , 266 S.E.2d 824, 829 (citations omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 102 , 273 S.E.2d 306 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 , 101 S. Ct. 1356 , 67 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1981). - 13 - Lastly, Respondent-Mother challenges the trial court’s “ultimate” Findings of Fact which form the basis for the neglect adjudication under N.C. Gen. 2026See State v. McNeil, 47 N.C. App. 30, 38 , 266 S.E.2d 824, 829 (citations omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 102 , 273 S.E.2d 306 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 , 101 S. Ct. 1356 , 67 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1981). - 13 - Lastly, Respondent-Mother challenges the trial court’s “ultimate” Findings of Fact which form the basis for the neglect adjudication under N.C. Gen. | 1 | 1 |
McNeil v. North Carolinagreen2 sentences2026See State v. McNeil, 47 N.C. App. 30, 38 , 266 S.E.2d 824, 829 (citations omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 102 , 273 S.E.2d 306 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 , 101 S. Ct. 1356 , 67 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1981). - 13 - Lastly, Respondent-Mother challenges the trial court’s “ultimate” Findings of Fact which form the basis for the neglect adjudication under N.C. Gen. 2026See State v. McNeil, 47 N.C. App. 30, 38 , 266 S.E.2d 824, 829 (citations omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 102 , 273 S.E.2d 306 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 , 101 S. Ct. 1356 , 67 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1981). - 13 - Lastly, Respondent-Mother challenges the trial court’s “ultimate” Findings of Fact which form the basis for the neglect adjudication under N.C. Gen. | 1 | 1 |
State v. McNeilgreen2 sentences2026See State v. McNeil, 47 N.C. App. 30, 38 , 266 S.E.2d 824, 829 (citations omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 102 , 273 S.E.2d 306 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 , 101 S. Ct. 1356 , 67 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1981). - 13 - Lastly, Respondent-Mother challenges the trial court’s “ultimate” Findings of Fact which form the basis for the neglect adjudication under N.C. Gen. 2026See State v. McNeil, 47 N.C. App. 30, 38 , 266 S.E.2d 824, 829 (citations omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 102 , 273 S.E.2d 306 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 , 101 S. Ct. 1356 , 67 L. Ed. 2d 339 (1981). - 13 - Lastly, Respondent-Mother challenges the trial court’s “ultimate” Findings of Fact which form the basis for the neglect adjudication under N.C. Gen. | 1 | 1 |
In re: C.M.P., C.Q.M.P.green2 sentences2025See In re C.M.P., 254 N.C. App. at 652 , 803 S.E.2d at 857 . 2025See In re C.M.P., 254 N.C. App. at 652 , 803 S.E.2d at 857 . | 1 | 1 |
In re S.N.green1 sentence2013See S.N., 194 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re: R.P.
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.