Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stout v. Stoutgreen2 sentences2010Id. at ¶¶ 6, 9, 18; see Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61 , 560 N.W.2d 903 . [¶ 55] With regard to relocation of children, N.D.C.C. § 14-09-07 (2009) 2 states: A parent entitled to the custody of a child may not change the residence of the child to another state except upon order of the court or with the consent of the noncustodial parent, if the noncustodial parent has been given visitation rights by the decree. 2010Id. at ¶¶ 6, 9, 18; see Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61 , 560 N.W.2d 903 . [¶ 55] With regard to relocation of children, N.D.C.C. § 14-09-07 (2009) 2 states: A parent entitled to the custody of a child may not change the residence of the child to another state except upon order of the court or with the consent of the noncustodial parent, if the noncustodial parent has been given visitation rights by the decree. | 3 | 7 |
Goff v. Goffgreen2 sentences1999Having carefully reviewed the record evidence, we conclude the trial court’s finding Zich failed to prove the move is in the best interests of the children is clearly erroneous. [¶ 28] In Goff, 1999 ND 95, ¶ 22 , 593 N.W.2d 768 , we concluded the trial court’s findings under the first and fourth Stout factors were based upon erroneous interpretations of the law. 1999Having carefully reviewed the record evidence, we conclude the trial court’s finding Zich failed to prove the move is in the best interests of the children is clearly erroneous. [¶ 28] In Goff, 1999 ND 95, ¶ 22 , 593 N.W.2d 768 , we concluded the trial court’s findings under the first and fourth Stout factors were based upon erroneous interpretations of the law. | 2 | 4 |
Security National Bank, Edgeley v. Waldgreen2 sentences1999Security Nat’l Bank, Edgeley v. Wald, 536 N.W.2d 924, 928 (N.D.1995). [¶ 19] Kelvin argues the trial court erred because the letter is material evidence under the Stout factors for determining whether a custodial parent’s move is in the child’s best interests. 1999Security Nat’l Bank, Edgeley v. Wald, 536 N.W.2d 924, 928 (N.D.1995). [¶ 19] Kelvin argues the trial court erred because the letter is material evidence under the Stout factors for determining whether a custodial parent’s move is in the child’s best interests. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hawkinson v. Hawkinson
green
2 sentences2001The fourth factor of the Stout analysis, specifically pertaining to visitation of the noncustodial parent after a relocation, was restated in Hawkinson v. Hawkinson, 1999 ND 58, ¶ 9 , 591 N.W.2d 144 : The potential negative impact on the relationship between the noncustodial parent and the child, including whether there is a realistic opportunity for visitation which can provide an adequate basis for preserving and fostering the noncustodial parent’s relationship with the child if relocation is allowed, and the likelihood that each parent will comply with such alternate visitation. [¶ 10] We h 2001The fourth factor of the Stout analysis, specifically pertaining to visitation of the noncustodial parent after a relocation, was restated in Hawkinson v. Hawkinson, 1999 ND 58, ¶ 9 , 591 N.W.2d 144 : The potential negative impact on the relationship between the noncustodial parent and the child, including whether there is a realistic opportunity for visitation which can provide an adequate basis for preserving and fostering the noncustodial parent’s relationship with the child if relocation is allowed, and the likelihood that each parent will comply with such alternate visitation. [¶ 10] We h | 4 | 1999–2001 |
Keller v. Keller
green
2 sentences1999See Goff, 1999 ND 95, ¶ 22 , 593 N.W.2d 768 (reversing and remanding for a redetermination of two factors); Keller, 1998 ND 179, ¶ 20 , 584 N.W.2d 509 (reversing and remanding directing district court to allow the move and establish visitation); Paulson v. Bauske, 1998 ND 17, ¶ 17 , 574 N.W.2d 801 (reversing and remanding with directions to enter judgment allowing the move). 1999See Goff, 1999 ND 95, ¶ 22 , 593 N.W.2d 768 (reversing and remanding for a redetermination of two factors); Keller, 1998 ND 179, ¶ 20 , 584 N.W.2d 509 (reversing and remanding directing district court to allow the move and establish visitation); Paulson v. Bauske, 1998 ND 17, ¶ 17 , 574 N.W.2d 801 (reversing and remanding with directions to enter judgment allowing the move). | 3 | 1999–1999 |
Paulson v. Bauske
green
2 sentences1999See Goff, 1999 ND 95, ¶ 22 , 593 N.W.2d 768 (reversing and remanding for a redetermination of two factors); Keller, 1998 ND 179, ¶ 20 , 584 N.W.2d 509 (reversing and remanding directing district court to allow the move and establish visitation); Paulson v. Bauske, 1998 ND 17, ¶ 17 , 574 N.W.2d 801 (reversing and remanding with directions to enter judgment allowing the move). 1999See Goff, 1999 ND 95, ¶ 22 , 593 N.W.2d 768 (reversing and remanding for a redetermination of two factors); Keller, 1998 ND 179, ¶ 20 , 584 N.W.2d 509 (reversing and remanding directing district court to allow the move and establish visitation); Paulson v. Bauske, 1998 ND 17, ¶ 17 , 574 N.W.2d 801 (reversing and remanding with directions to enter judgment allowing the move). | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.