Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McGinnisgreen2 sentences2022See State v. McGinnis, 2022 ND 46, ¶ 7 , 971 N.W.2d 380 (an appellant that fails to file a transcript on appeal assumes the risks and consequences of such failure). 2022See State v. McGinnis, 2022 ND 46, ¶ 7 , 971 N.W.2d 380 (an appellant that fails to file a transcript on appeal assumes the risks and consequences of such failure). | 2 | 2 |
Smestad v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2018See Smestad v. Harris , 2011 ND 91 , ¶ 6, 796 N.W.2d 662 (stating this Court does not second-guess the district court's credibility findings in cases of conflicting testimony). [¶ 3] Waide did not file a transcript of the evidentiary hearing as required by N.D.R.App.P. 10(b)(1). | 1 | 1 |
Smestad v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2018See Smestad v. Harris , 2011 ND 91 , ¶ 6, 796 N.W.2d 662 (stating this Court does not second-guess the district court's credibility findings in cases of conflicting testimony). [¶ 3] Waide did not file a transcript of the evidentiary hearing as required by N.D.R.App.P. 10(b)(1). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Fargo v. Erickson
green
2 sentences2000We have warned that an appellant “assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript.” City of Fargo v. Erickson , 1999 ND 145 , ¶ 16, 598 N.W.2d 787 (citation omitted). 2000We have warned that an appellant “assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript.” City of Fargo v. Erickson, 1999 ND 145, ¶ 16 , 598 N.W.2d 787 (citation omitted). | 3 | 2000–2000 |
City of Fargo v. Erickson
green
2 sentences2000We have warned that an appellant “assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript.” City of Fargo v. Erickson , 1999 ND 145 , ¶ 16, 598 N.W.2d 787 (citation omitted). 2000We have warned that an appellant “assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript.” City of Fargo v. Erickson, 1999 ND 145, ¶ 16 , 598 N.W.2d 787 (citation omitted). | 3 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Everett
green
2 sentences2024Chase v. State, 2018 ND 154 , 913 N.W.2d 774 . [¶4] Chase then sought relief from the denial of his first application under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). 2019Chase v. State , 2018 ND 154 , ¶ 1, 913 N.W.2d 774 . [¶3] On November 13, 2018, Chase filed a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment, seeking relief from the district court's December 21, 2017 order denying post-conviction relief, alleging his post-conviction counsel: (1) provided ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) coached Chase to lie at the evidentiary hearing; (3) violated ethics rules; (4) violated the rules of appellate procedure; and (5) attempted to cover up his errors by advising Chase not to file a federal habeas corpus petition; and (6) attempted to convince Chase to | 2 | 2019–2024 |
Van Chase v. State
neutral
2 sentences2024Chase v. State, 2018 ND 154 , 913 N.W.2d 774 . [¶4] Chase then sought relief from the denial of his first application under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). 2019Chase v. State , 2018 ND 154 , ¶ 1, 913 N.W.2d 774 . [¶3] On November 13, 2018, Chase filed a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment, seeking relief from the district court's December 21, 2017 order denying post-conviction relief, alleging his post-conviction counsel: (1) provided ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) coached Chase to lie at the evidentiary hearing; (3) violated ethics rules; (4) violated the rules of appellate procedure; and (5) attempted to cover up his errors by advising Chase not to file a federal habeas corpus petition; and (6) attempted to convince Chase to | 2 | 2019–2024 |
Christianson v. Christianson
green
2 sentences2005Christianson v. Christianson, 2003 ND 186, ¶ 13 , 671 N.W.2d 801 . 2005Christianson v. Christianson, 2003 ND 186, ¶ 13 , 671 N.W.2d 801 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.