9 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Risor v. Nebraska Boilergreen2 sentences2019Although our court made that statement in relation to explain- ing why injuries to separate body parts do not invoke the doctrine of apportionment, it equally applies to Appellants’ argument here. [7] As the Nebraska Supreme Court noted in Risor v. Nebraska Boiler, 274 Neb. 906, 912 , 744 N.W.2d 693, 698 (2008), “The principal purpose of the [Nebraska Workers’ Compensation] Act is to provide an injured worker with prompt relief from the adverse economic effects caused by a work- related injury or occupational disease.” Section 48-121 pro- vides that “[t]he following schedule of compensation is 2019Although our court made that statement in relation to explain- ing why injuries to separate body parts do not invoke the doctrine of apportionment, it equally applies to Appellants’ argument here. [7] As the Nebraska Supreme Court noted in Risor v. Nebraska Boiler, 274 Neb. 906, 912 , 744 N.W.2d 693, 698 (2008), “The principal purpose of the [Nebraska Workers’ Compensation] Act is to provide an injured worker with prompt relief from the adverse economic effects caused by a work- related injury or occupational disease.” Section 48-121 pro- vides that “[t]he following schedule of compensation is | 1 | 1 |
Golnick v. Callendergreen1 sentence2019See Golnick v. Callender, 290 Neb. 395 , 860 N.W.2d 180 (2015). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 256828green1 sentence1981See, United Painters & Decorators v. Britton, 301 F.2d 560 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gustafson v. Burlington Northern Railroad
neutral
2 sentences2007Co., 252 Neb. 226 , 561 N.W.2d 212 (1997),] is probably the most applicable apportionment instruction appropriate where there is evidence of a preexisting condition, but if the degree to which the condition may have been aggravated could not be determined, an apportionment *828 instruction in the absence of proof of aggravation. 2007Co., 252 Neb. 226 , 561 N.W.2d 212 (1997),] is probably the most applicable apportionment instruction appropriate where there is evidence of a preexisting condition, but if the degree to which the condition may have been aggravated could not be determined, an apportionment *828 instruction in the absence of proof of aggravation. | 3 | 2007–2026 |
McLaughlin v. BNSF Railway Co.
green
2 sentences2026Co., 300 P.3d 925 (Colo. App. 2012). 58 Sauer v. Burlington Northern R. 2026Co., 300 P.3d 925 (Colo. App. 2012). 58 Sauer v. Burlington Northern R. | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Kirchner v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2019In Kirchner v. Wilson, 251 Neb. 56 , 554 N.W.2d 782 (1996), the Supreme Court found the apportionment instruction was warranted by the evidence because there was evidence that a - 931 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 27 Nebraska Appellate Reports KELLY v. CUTCH, INC. 2019In Kirchner v. Wilson, 251 Neb. 56 , 554 N.W.2d 782 (1996), the Supreme Court found the apportionment instruction was warranted by the evidence because there was evidence that a - 931 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 27 Nebraska Appellate Reports KELLY v. CUTCH, INC. | 2 | 1997–2019 |
Picard v. P & C Group 1
green
1 sentence2019We believe the better reasoned interpretation of § 48-121(2) requires that the court review Picard’s lost earning - 669 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 27 Nebraska A ppellate R eports PICARD v. P & C GROUP 1 Cite as 27 Neb. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Kelly v. Cutch, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019Cite as 27 Neb. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Ketteler v. Daniel
green
2 sentences2015In short, the Defendant takes the Plaintiff as he finds her.’”26 The jury returned a verdict for 25 Id. at 296 , 556 N.W.2d at 629 . 26 Id. 2015In short, the Defendant takes the Plaintiff as he finds her.’”26 The jury returned a verdict for 25 Id. at 296 , 556 N.W.2d at 629 . 26 Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Herrera v. American Standard Insurance
green
2 sentences1990Co., 203 Neb. 477 , 279 N.W.2d 140 (1979), and requested special verdict forms and that because their motions were improperly overruled, the cases should be remanded for an apportionment hearing to determine the portion of the damages award which they, as garnishees, should be required to pay under the insurance policies. 1990Co., 203 Neb. 477 , 279 N.W.2d 140 (1979), and requested special verdict forms and that because their motions were improperly overruled, the cases should be remanded for an apportionment hearing to determine the portion of the damages award which they, as garnishees, should be required to pay under the insurance policies. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.