Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
9 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 1923–1956 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fields v. Stategreen1 sentence1925See, also, Fields v. State, 107 Neb. 91 , and the above cases there cited, with excerpts therefrom, at page 98 and following. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grammer v. State
neutral
2 sentences1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . 1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . | 2 | 1940–1949 |
Bush v. State
neutral
2 sentences1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . 1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . | 2 | 1940–1949 |
Stagemeyer v. State
green
2 sentences1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . 1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . | 2 | 1940–1949 |
Zachmann v. Zachmann
green
2 sentences1949Dec. 644 , and note, p. 649; Wilson v. Babb, 18 S. Car. 59; Zachmann v. Zachmann, 201 Ill. 380 ; Tioga County v. South Creek Township, 75 Pa. St. 433. 1923Dec. 644 , and note, p. 649; Wilson v. Babb, 18 S. Car. 59; Zachmann v. Zachmann, 201 Ill. 380 ; Tioga County v. South Creek Township, 75 Pa. St. 433. | 2 | 1923–1949 |
Simpson v. Hite
green
2 sentences1956Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal. 2d 125 , 222 P. 2d 225 ; Whitbeck v. Funk, 140 Or. 70 , 12 P. 2d 1019 ; Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134 , 277 P. 308 . 1956Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal. 2d 125 , 222 P. 2d 225 ; Whitbeck v. Funk, 140 Or. 70 , 12 P. 2d 1019 ; Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134 , 277 P. 308 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Hurst v. City of Burlingame
green
2 sentences1956Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal. 2d 125 , 222 P. 2d 225 ; Whitbeck v. Funk, 140 Or. 70 , 12 P. 2d 1019 ; Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134 , 277 P. 308 . 1956Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal. 2d 125 , 222 P. 2d 225 ; Whitbeck v. Funk, 140 Or. 70 , 12 P. 2d 1019 ; Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134 , 277 P. 308 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Whitbeck v. Funk
neutral
2 sentences1956Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal. 2d 125 , 222 P. 2d 225 ; Whitbeck v. Funk, 140 Or. 70 , 12 P. 2d 1019 ; Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134 , 277 P. 308 . 1956Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal. 2d 125 , 222 P. 2d 225 ; Whitbeck v. Funk, 140 Or. 70 , 12 P. 2d 1019 ; Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134 , 277 P. 308 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Jones v. State
neutral
2 sentences1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . 1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Cheney v. State
neutral
2 sentences1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . 1949The following cases support this rule: Grammer v. State, 103 Neb. 325 , 172 N. W. 41 ; Bush v. State, 112 Neb. 384 , 199 N. W. 792 ; Stagemeyer v. State, 133 Neb. 9 , 273 N. W. 824 .” See, also, Jones v. State, 97 Neb. 151 , 149 N. W. 327 , and Cheney v. State, 101 Neb. 461 , 163 N. W. 804 . | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Allen v. Neff
neutral
2 sentences1947The presumption of a grant is afforded only because possession amounting to a continuous claim of title has been acquiesced in for a period necessary to give a prescriptive right. .Therefore, the presumed grant can never extend further than the user in which the other party has acquiesced.” The following cases support the rule as it is stated in Corpus Juris Secundum and the American Law Reports: Allen v. Neff, 102 W. 1947Va. 230 , 135 S. E. 2 , 50 A. L. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Willis v. . Sharp
neutral
1 sentence1933The following cases support this rule: Willis v. Sharp, 124 N. Y. 406 ; Hilliard v. Sterlingworth R. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Lowell v. Buffalo County
neutral
1 sentence1932The following cases support this rule: Lowell v. Buffalo County, 119 Neb. 776 ; Chicago, R. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Mathews v. State
neutral
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Solander v. People
green
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Johnson v. People
neutral
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State v. Howard
green
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State v. Dickinson
neutral
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Lamb v. State
neutral
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Clark v. State
green
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State v. Power
neutral
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State v. Crofford
green
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
People v. Atwood
neutral
1 sentence1925The following cases support the rule: Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 ; Clark v. State, 102 Neb. 728 ; Mathews v. State, 111 Neb. 593 ; State v. Crofford, 133 Ia. 478 ; Solander v. People, 2 Colo. 48 ; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224 ; People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 ; State v. Power, 24 Wash. 34 ; State v. Dickinson, 41 Wis. 299 ; State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.