dominant principle (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

dominant principle in New Jersey

9 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1955–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGEgreen
nj · 1954 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1955–2003
2 sentences

2003Baldwin, supra, 16 N.J. at 340 , 108 A. 2d 598 .

1960Const. In the case of Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329, 340 (1954), the court said that "the dominant principle of the new constitutional mandate is equality of treatment and burden.

23
Gibraltar Corrugated Paper Co. v. Township of North Bergengreen
nj · 1955 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1959–1995
2 sentences

1995All real property ... shall be assessed according to the same standard of value; » The Legislature has not disturbed the provisions which call for true value assessment, but the dominant principle now is equality of treatment and burden, the standard employed is but the level on which the objective is to be realized. [Gibraltar Corrugated Paper Co., supra, 20 N.J. at 218-19 , 119 A.2d 135 ; emphasis added] Thus, although N.J.S.A. 54:4-23 was enacted pursuant to the Constitution of 1844, the “full and fair value” standard expressed in this statute is faithful to, and consistent with, the “same

1995All real property ... shall be assessed according to the same standard of value; » The Legislature has not disturbed the provisions which call for true value assessment, but the dominant principle now is equality of treatment and burden, the standard employed is but the level on which the objective is to be realized. [Gibraltar Corrugated Paper Co., supra, 20 N.J. at 218-19 , 119 A.2d 135 ; emphasis added] Thus, although N.J.S.A. 54:4-23 was enacted pursuant to the Constitution of 1844, the “full and fair value” standard expressed in this statute is faithful to, and consistent with, the “same

12
REGENT CARE v. Hackensack Citygreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2003 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022"The dominant principle of the [New Jersey] Constitution's uniformity clause is to mandate equality of treatment and burden." Regent Care Center, Inc. v. Hackensack City. 362 N.J.

11
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green
scotus · 1993 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. , 509 U.S. 579 , 585-87, 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (observing that Frye had been "the dominant standard for determining the admissibility of novel scientific evidence" for over seventy years).

2018See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. , 509 U.S. 579 , 585-87, 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (observing that Frye had been "the dominant standard for determining the admissibility of novel scientific evidence" for over seventy years).

11
Trustees for the Support of Public Schools v. Inhabitants of Trentongreen
· 1879 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1960–1960
1 sentence

1960And this was of the essence and spirit of the old Constitution as well." In the case of Trustees for Support of Public Schools v. City of Trenton, 30 N.J.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Robert green
nj · 1962
1 sentence

1971Cf. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Robert, 36 N.J. 561 (1962).

11971–1971
Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield green
scotus · 1918
2 sentences

1957Co. case (23 N.J. at pages 569-571), the court announced that the New Jersey constitutional requirement for taxation of all real property assessed for the support of local government "according to the same standard of value," Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 1, implied the dominant principle of "equality of treatment and burden"; that this provision constitutes the New Jersey State sanction against discriminatory assessment; and that the principle stated is essentially the same requirement as is enforced against the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uni

1957Co. case (23 N.J. at pages 569-571), the court announced that the New Jersey constitutional requirement for taxation of all real property assessed for the support of local government "according to the same standard of value," Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 1, implied the dominant principle of "equality of treatment and burden"; that this provision constitutes the New Jersey State sanction against discriminatory assessment; and that the principle stated is essentially the same requirement as is enforced against the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uni

11957–1957
Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County green
scotus · 1923
2 sentences

1957Co. case (23 N.J. at pages 569-571), the court announced that the New Jersey constitutional requirement for taxation of all real property assessed for the support of local government "according to the same standard of value," Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 1, implied the dominant principle of "equality of treatment and burden"; that this provision constitutes the New Jersey State sanction against discriminatory assessment; and that the principle stated is essentially the same requirement as is enforced against the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uni

1957Co. case (23 N.J. at pages 569-571), the court announced that the New Jersey constitutional requirement for taxation of all real property assessed for the support of local government "according to the same standard of value," Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 1, implied the dominant principle of "equality of treatment and burden"; that this provision constitutes the New Jersey State sanction against discriminatory assessment; and that the principle stated is essentially the same requirement as is enforced against the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uni

11957–1957
Township of Hillsborough v. Cromwell green
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

1957Co. case (23 N.J. at pages 569-571), the court announced that the New Jersey constitutional requirement for taxation of all real property assessed for the support of local government "according to the same standard of value," Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 1, implied the dominant principle of "equality of treatment and burden"; that this provision constitutes the New Jersey State sanction against discriminatory assessment; and that the principle stated is essentially the same requirement as is enforced against the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uni

1957Co. case (23 N.J. at pages 569-571), the court announced that the New Jersey constitutional requirement for taxation of all real property assessed for the support of local government "according to the same standard of value," Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 1, implied the dominant principle of "equality of treatment and burden"; that this provision constitutes the New Jersey State sanction against discriminatory assessment; and that the principle stated is essentially the same requirement as is enforced against the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uni

11957–1957

Where else courts name it

WI 20 (1909–2026) IL 18 (1917–2021) TX 18 (1939–2010) MI 11 (1976–2018) PA 11 (1930–2025) TN 10 (1991–2024) NJ 9 (1955–2022) MS 6 (1948–2008) WA 6 (1917–2012) MD 5 (1909–2023) NY 5 (1912–2005) CA 5 (1922–2022) CT 4 (1927–2004) FL 4 (1975–2007) MA 4 (1981–2005) HI 3 (1981–1998) CO 3 (1985–2010) AL 3 (1963–1985) NC 3 (1908–2003) MO 2 (1900–1955) OH 2 (1895–2004) MT 2 (2003–2008) IN 2 (1992–2013) SC 2 (1927–1963) MN 2 (1998–1998) KY 2 (1959–2025) AZ 2 (2000–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check