dominant rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

dominant rule in Texas

18 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1939–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. Costellogreen
tex · 1940 · cited in 6 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1951–2006
2 sentences

1981P. Costello et al., 135 Tex. 307 , 143 S.W.2d 577, 580 , 130 A.L.R. 1220 , said: “The dominant rule controlling the construction of a statute is to ascertain the intention of the legislature expressed therein.

1981P. Costello et al., 135 Tex. 307 , 143 S.W.2d 577, 580 , 130 A.L.R. 1220 , said: “The dominant rule controlling the construction of a statute is to ascertain the intention of the legislature expressed therein.

26
City of Sherman v. Public Utility Com'n of Texasgreen
tex · 1983 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1985–1986
2 sentences

1986City of Sherman v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, 643 S.W.2d at 684 .

1985See City of Sherman v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, 643 S.W.2d 681 , 684 (Tex. 1983).

23
Heller v. Hellergreen
tex · 1925 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010See Heller , 269 S.W. at 774 .

2010See Heller, 269 S.W. at 774 .

22
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Walkergreen
· 1935 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1966–1987
2 sentences

1966However, the dominant rule to be observed is to give effect to the intention of the Legislature.” Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Walker, 125 Tex. 430 , 83 S.W.2d 929, 934 (1935).

1966However, the dominant rule to be observed is to give effect to the intention of the Legislature.” Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Walker, 125 Tex. 430 , 83 S.W.2d 929, 934 (1935).

22
City of West Tawakoni v. Williamsgreen
texapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
2 sentences

1990Shoppers World, Inc., 380 S.W.2d at 111 ; see also City of West Tawakoni v. Williams, 742 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, writ denied) (holding that the dominant rule to be observed in construction of statute is to give effect to intention of legislature).

1990Shoppers World, Inc., 380 S.W.2d at 111 ; see also City of West Tawakoni v. Williams, 742 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, writ denied) (holding that the dominant rule to be observed in construction of statute is to give effect to intention of legislature).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. South Texas Lumber Co. green
texcommnapp · 1930
1 sentence

2009South Texas Lumber, 29 S.W.2d at 1011 .

12009–2009
State v. Shoppers World, Inc. green
tex · 1964
2 sentences

1990Shoppers World, Inc., 380 S.W.2d at 111 ; see also City of West Tawakoni v. Williams, 742 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, writ denied) (holding that the dominant rule to be observed in construction of statute is to give effect to intention of legislature).

1990Shoppers World, Inc., 380 S.W.2d at 111 ; see also City of West Tawakoni v. Williams, 742 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, writ denied) (holding that the dominant rule to be observed in construction of statute is to give effect to intention of legislature).

11990–1990
City of Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control District green
tex · 1964
1 sentence

1984Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control Dist., 377 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler, 1964) rev’d on other grounds, 383 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.1964).

11984–1984
City of Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control District green
texapp · 1964
1 sentence

1984Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control Dist., 377 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler, 1964) rev’d on other grounds, 383 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.1964).

11984–1984
Morris v. City of San Antonio green
texapp · 1978
1 sentence

1981An Act should be given a fair and sensible construction, in order to carry out the purposes for which it was enacted, and not be construed in such manner as to nullify or defeat its purposes.” We further hold that the term “public utility” referred to in Section 48 is not dependent upon Section 3(c)(4) which has been held unconstitutional in Morris v. City of San Antonio, 572 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Civ.App.— Austin 1978 , no writ).

11981–1981
Calvert v. Texas Pipe Line Company green
tex · 1974
1 sentence

1981Jessen Associates, Inc. v. Bullock, 531 S.W.2d 593 (Tex. 1975); Calvert v. Texas Pipe Line Co., 517 S.W.2d 777 (Tex. 1974).

11981–1981
Jessen Associates, Inc. v. Bullock green
tex · 1975
1 sentence

1981Jessen Associates, Inc. v. Bullock, 531 S.W.2d 593 (Tex. 1975); Calvert v. Texas Pipe Line Co., 517 S.W.2d 777 (Tex. 1974).

11981–1981
Speer & Goodnight v. Sykes green
· 1909
2 sentences

1939This act, evidenced by the letter, in conferring upon the natural father a perferential right to said custody, was, in no sense, invalid; Sykes v. Speer, Tex.Civ.App. 112 S.W. 422 , affirmed by the Supreme Court, 102 Tex. 451 , 119 S.W. 86 , 132 Am.St.Rep. 896 ; and the subsequent possession by appellee was likewise rendered lawful.

1939This act, evidenced by the letter, in conferring upon the natural father a perferential right to said custody, was, in no sense, invalid; Sykes v. Speer, Tex.Civ.App. 112 S.W. 422 , affirmed by the Supreme Court, 102 Tex. 451 , 119 S.W. 86 , 132 Am.St.Rep. 896 ; and the subsequent possession by appellee was likewise rendered lawful.

11939–1939

Where else courts name it

WI 20 (1909–2026) IL 18 (1917–2021) TX 18 (1939–2010) MI 11 (1976–2018) PA 11 (1930–2025) TN 10 (1991–2024) NJ 9 (1955–2022) MS 6 (1948–2008) WA 6 (1917–2012) MD 5 (1909–2023) NY 5 (1912–2005) CA 5 (1922–2022) CT 4 (1927–2004) FL 4 (1975–2007) MA 4 (1981–2005) HI 3 (1981–1998) CO 3 (1985–2010) AL 3 (1963–1985) NC 3 (1908–2003) MO 2 (1900–1955) OH 2 (1895–2004) MT 2 (2003–2008) IN 2 (1992–2013) SC 2 (1927–1963) MN 2 (1998–1998) KY 2 (1959–2025) AZ 2 (2000–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check