Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beauchamp v. Amediogreen2 sentences2020“The overall purpose of the [TCA] was to reestablish the immunity of public entities while coherently ameliorating the harsh results of the doctrine [of sovereign immunity].” Beauchamp v. Amedio, 164 N.J. 111, 115 (2000). 2019It is well-established that the purpose of the Tort Claims Act (TCA) is to "reestablish the immunity of public entities while coherently ameliorating the harsh results of the doctrine." Beauchamp v. Amedio, 164 N.J. 111, 115 (2000) (citing N.J.S.A. 59:1-2). | 5 | 6 |
Alston v. City of Camdengreen2 sentences2023The TCA was “designed to reestablish the immunity of public entities while relieving some of the harsh results of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.” Alston v. City of Camden, 168 N.J. 170, 176 (2001) (quotation omitted). 2017The TCA was "designed to reestablish the immunity 9 A-0220-15T2 of public entities while relieving some of the harsh results of the doctrine of sovereign immunity." Alston v. City of Camden, 168 N.J. 170, 176 (2001) (citation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Lowe v. Zarghamigreen1 sentence2019The notice requirements of the TCA "were not intended as a 'trap for the unwary.'" Lowe v. Zarghami, 158 N.J. 606, 629 (1999) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
green
2 sentences2001But the ultimate factfinder may pick and choose inferences from the evidence to the extent that "a miscarriage of justice under the law" is not created. [ 142 N.J. at 536 , 666 A. 2d 146 ] In 1972, the Legislature enacted the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 59:123. *505 The purpose of the Act was to reestablish the immunity of public entities while relieving some of the harsh results of the doctrine. 2001But the ultimate factfinder may pick and choose inferences from the evidence to the extent that "a miscarriage of justice under the law" is not created. [ 142 N.J. at 536 , 666 A. 2d 146 ] In 1972, the Legislature enacted the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 59:123. *505 The purpose of the Act was to reestablish the immunity of public entities while relieving some of the harsh results of the doctrine. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.