Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Saldana v. City of Camdengreen2 sentences2007More specifically, in Iliadis , we identified as important to the superiority analysis a consideration of the “class members’ ‘lack of financial wherewithal.’ ” Id. at 115 , 922 A.2d 710 (quoting Saldana v. City of Camden, 252 N.J.Super. 188, 200 , 599 A.2d 582 (App.Div.1991)). 2007More specifically, in Iliadis , we identified as important to the superiority analysis a consideration of the “class members’ ‘lack of financial wherewithal.’ ” Id. at 115 , 922 A.2d 710 (quoting Saldana v. City of Camden, 252 N.J.Super. 188, 200 , 599 A.2d 582 (App.Div.1991)). | 2 | 4 |
In Re Gonzalezgreen2 sentences2011A superiority analysis "necessarily implies a comparison with alternative procedures, and mandates assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of using the class-action device in relation to other methods of litigation." Iliadis, supra, 191 N.J. at 114 , *474 922 A. 2d 710 (internal citations and quotations omitted) (citing In re Cadillac, 93 N.J. 412, 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 (1983)). 2009The superiority requirement "demands (1) an informed consideration of alternative methods of adjudication of each issue, (2) a comparison of the fairness to all whose interests may be involved between such alternative methods and a class action, and (3) a comparison of the efficiency of adjudication of each method." Iliadis, supra, 191 N.J. at 114-15 , 922 A. 2d 710 . | 1 | 6 |
In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class Actiongreen2 sentences2011A superiority analysis "necessarily implies a comparison with alternative procedures, and mandates assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of using the class-action device in relation to other methods of litigation." Iliadis, supra, 191 N.J. at 114 , *474 922 A. 2d 710 (internal citations and quotations omitted) (citing In re Cadillac, 93 N.J. 412, 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 (1983)). 2011A superiority analysis "necessarily implies a comparison with alternative procedures, and mandates assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of using the class-action device in relation to other methods of litigation." Iliadis, supra, 191 N.J. at 114 , *474 922 A. 2d 710 (internal citations and quotations omitted) (citing In re Cadillac, 93 N.J. 412, 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 (1983)). | 1 | 5 |
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co.green1 sentence2021One factor that should be considered in a fairness determination is “whether any one individual who has suffered a wrong will have the financial wherewithal or incentive to prosecute a claim that might cost more than its worth.” Ibid.; accord Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co., Inc., 192 N.J. 372, 384 (2007) (“[I]n Iliadis, we identified as important to the superiority analysis a consideration of the class members’ lack of financial wherewithal. | 1 | 1 |
Loc. Baking Prod. v. Kosher Bagel.green1 sentence2020Superiority Analysis of the superiority requirement "necessarily implies a comparison with alternative procedures, and mandates assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of using the class[]action device in relation to other methods of litigation." Local Baking Prods., Inc. v. Kosher Bagel Munch, Inc., 421 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011A superiority analysis "necessarily implies a comparison with alternative procedures, and mandates assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of using the class-action device in relation to other methods of litigation." Iliadis, supra, 191 N.J. at 114 , *474 922 A. 2d 710 (internal citations and quotations omitted) (citing In re Cadillac, 93 N.J. 412, 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 (1983)). 2009The superiority requirement "demands (1) an informed consideration of alternative methods of adjudication of each issue, (2) a comparison of the fairness to all whose interests may be involved between such alternative methods and a class action, and (3) a comparison of the efficiency of adjudication of each method." Iliadis, supra, 191 N.J. at 114-15 , 922 A. 2d 710 . | 3 | 2007–2011 |
UNITED CONS. FIN. SER. v. Carbo
green
2 sentences2011In Carbo , we considered whether the superiority requirement is fulfilled when "the common, typical and predominant claim of the class members is a statutory violation for which a statutory civil penalty will be awarded. . . ." Id. at 308 , 982 A. 2d 7 . 2011In Carbo , we considered whether the superiority requirement is fulfilled when "the common, typical and predominant claim of the class members is a statutory violation for which a statutory civil penalty will be awarded. . . ." Id. at 308 , 982 A. 2d 7 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Varacallo v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2007In Iliadis, supra, we also referred, in part, to the significance of plaintiffs having “nominal” claims, 191 N.J. at 115 , 922 A.2d 710 (citing Varacallo, supra, 332 N.J.Super. at 52 , 752 A2d 807 ), and to the role of class actions as an “equalizing mechanism” between adversaries of vastly different resources, id. at 115 , 922 A.2d 710 , as a part of the considerations that bear on the superiority analysis. 2007In Iliadis, supra, we also referred, in part, to the significance of plaintiffs having “nominal” claims, 191 N.J. at 115 , 922 A.2d 710 (citing Varacallo, supra, 332 N.J.Super. at 52 , 752 A2d 807 ), and to the role of class actions as an “equalizing mechanism” between adversaries of vastly different resources, id. at 115 , 922 A.2d 710 , as a part of the considerations that bear on the superiority analysis. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Kronisch v. Howard Savings Inst.
green
2 sentences2003In re Cadillac, supra ., 93 N.J. at 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 , (relying on Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747 (3d Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974), and Kronisch v. Howard Savings Inst., 143 N.J.Super. 423 , 363 A. 2d 376 , (App.Div.1976)); Saldana v. City of Camden, supra., 252 N.J.Super. at 200 , 599 A. 2d 582 , This is a remedy which plaintiffs could request, if their claim survives a motion to dismiss under Missouri law. 2003In re Cadillac, supra ., 93 N.J. at 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 , (relying on Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747 (3d Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974), and Kronisch v. Howard Savings Inst., 143 N.J.Super. 423 , 363 A. 2d 376 , (App.Div.1976)); Saldana v. City of Camden, supra., 252 N.J.Super. at 200 , 599 A. 2d 582 , This is a remedy which plaintiffs could request, if their claim survives a motion to dismiss under Missouri law. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche Corporation
green
1 sentence2003In re Cadillac, supra ., 93 N.J. at 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 , (relying on Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747 (3d Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974), and Kronisch v. Howard Savings Inst., 143 N.J.Super. 423 , 363 A. 2d 376 , (App.Div.1976)); Saldana v. City of Camden, supra., 252 N.J.Super. at 200 , 599 A. 2d 582 , This is a remedy which plaintiffs could request, if their claim survives a motion to dismiss under Missouri law. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Swank v. Rodriguez
green
1 sentence2003In re Cadillac, supra ., 93 N.J. at 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 , (relying on Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747 (3d Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974), and Kronisch v. Howard Savings Inst., 143 N.J.Super. 423 , 363 A. 2d 376 , (App.Div.1976)); Saldana v. City of Camden, supra., 252 N.J.Super. at 200 , 599 A. 2d 582 , This is a remedy which plaintiffs could request, if their claim survives a motion to dismiss under Missouri law. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McLain v. Woodside
green
1 sentence2003In re Cadillac, supra ., 93 N.J. at 436 , 461 A. 2d 736 , (relying on Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747 (3d Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974), and Kronisch v. Howard Savings Inst., 143 N.J.Super. 423 , 363 A. 2d 376 , (App.Div.1976)); Saldana v. City of Camden, supra., 252 N.J.Super. at 200 , 599 A. 2d 582 , This is a remedy which plaintiffs could request, if their claim survives a motion to dismiss under Missouri law. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.