superiority requirement (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

superiority requirement in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1922–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
VOYAGER INSURANCE COMPANIES v. Whitson green
ala · 2003
2 sentences

2007Co. , 867 So.2d at 1077 .

2006Co., 867 So.2d at 1077 .

22006–2007
Ex Parte Green Tree Financial Corp. green
ala · 1998
1 sentence

2003Reynolds Metals , 825 So.2d at 108 . "[T]he greater the *Page 1104 number of individual issues, the less likely it is that a court may properly find that a class action is the superior means of litigating the plaintiff's claims." Green Tree , 723 So.2d at 9 .

12003–2003
Reynolds Metals Company v. Hill green
ala · 2002
1 sentence

2003Reynolds Metals , 825 So.2d at 108 . "[T]he greater the *Page 1104 number of individual issues, the less likely it is that a court may properly find that a class action is the superior means of litigating the plaintiff's claims." Green Tree , 723 So.2d at 9 .

12003–2003
Andrews v. AT&T green
ca11 · 1996
1 sentence

2001In concluding that the Shelley plaintiffs did not satisfy the superiority requirement as to their fraudulent-suppression claims, the district court focused on the manageability of the putative class action, stating: "With respect to [the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of a class action], `[i]ssues of class manageability encompass the "whole range of practical problems that may render the class action format inapposite for a particular suit."' Andrews v. ATT , 95 F.3d at 1023 (quoting Eisen v. Carlisle Jacquelin , 417 U.S. 156 , 164 (1974)).

12001–2001
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin green
scotus · 1974
1 sentence

2001In concluding that the Shelley plaintiffs did not satisfy the superiority requirement as to their fraudulent-suppression claims, the district court focused on the manageability of the putative class action, stating: "With respect to [the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of a class action], `[i]ssues of class manageability encompass the "whole range of practical problems that may render the class action format inapposite for a particular suit."' Andrews v. ATT , 95 F.3d at 1023 (quoting Eisen v. Carlisle Jacquelin , 417 U.S. 156 , 164 (1974)).

12001–2001
Mobile Towing & Wrecking Co. v. First Nat. Bank green
ala · 1918
2 sentences

1922Mobile Towing & Wrecking Co. v. First National Bank of Lakeland, 201 Ala. 419 , 78 South. 797 .

1922Mobile Towing & Wrecking Co. v. First National Bank of Lakeland, 201 Ala. 419 , 78 South. 797 .

11922–1922

Where else courts name it

AR 21 (2002–2024) OH 17 (1998–2022) NJ 9 (2003–2021) TX 8 (1972–2019) MO 6 (2006–2021) CA 6 (1988–2024) NY 6 (1980–2023) AL 5 (1922–2007) FL 4 (2011–2018) WA 3 (2003–2018) GA 3 (2007–2026) NM 2 (2007–2013) AZ 2 (1968–2002) WV 2 (2010–2010) MI 2 (2024–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check