Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Benavidez v. Shutivagreen1 sentence2019Medina, 252 F.3d at 1128 . {8} We use a two-step analysis when evaluating a claim of qualified immunity: “(1) the defendant’s alleged conduct violated a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the conduct.” Benavidez, 2015-NMCA-065, ¶ 6 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Carrillo v. Rostrogreen2 sentences2001Carrillo, 114 N.M. at 622 , 845 P.2d at 145 (quotation marks and quoted authority omitted) (addressing a similar argument in relation to the termination of an employee because of the employee's speech). [3] By focusing on St. 2001Carrillo, 114 N.M. at 622 , 845 P.2d at 145 (quotation marks and quoted authority omitted) (addressing a similar argument in relation to the termination of an employee because of the employee's speech). [3] By focusing on St. | 1 | 1 |
Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.green2 sentences1999See id. at 546 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 (allowing immediate appeal because “the matters embraced in the decision appealed from are not of such an interlocutory nature as to affect, or to be affected by, decision of the merits of this case”); cf. Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806 (holding “that a district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable ‘final decision’ ” (emphasis added)). 1999See id. at 546 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 (allowing immediate appeal because “the matters embraced in the decision appealed from are not of such an interlocutory nature as to affect, or to be affected by, decision of the merits of this case”); cf. Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806 (holding “that a district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable ‘final decision’ ” (emphasis added)). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 578752green1 sentence1999Workman v. Jordan, 958 F.2d 332, 336 (10th Cir.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Soares v. State of Connecticutgreen1 sentence1995Qualified Immunity. 28 The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from personal liability if their conduct either " 'did not violate "clearly established rights" of which a reasonable person would have known, or ... it was "objectively reasonable" to believe that [their] acts did not violate these clearly established rights.' " Soares v. Connecticut, 8 F.3d 917, 920 (2d Cir.1993) (quoting Finnegan v. Fountain, 915 F.2d 817, 823 (2d Cir.1990)). "[A] district court's denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable 'f | 1 | 1 |
Patricia Finnegan v. Richard Fountaingreen1 sentence1995Qualified Immunity. 28 The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from personal liability if their conduct either " 'did not violate "clearly established rights" of which a reasonable person would have known, or ... it was "objectively reasonable" to believe that [their] acts did not violate these clearly established rights.' " Soares v. Connecticut, 8 F.3d 917, 920 (2d Cir.1993) (quoting Finnegan v. Fountain, 915 F.2d 817, 823 (2d Cir.1990)). "[A] district court's denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable 'f | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Forsyth
green
2 sentences1999See id. at 546 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 (allowing immediate appeal because “the matters embraced in the decision appealed from are not of such an interlocutory nature as to affect, or to be affected by, decision of the merits of this case”); cf. Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806 (holding “that a district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable ‘final decision’ ” (emphasis added)). 1999See id. at 546 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 (allowing immediate appeal because “the matters embraced in the decision appealed from are not of such an interlocutory nature as to affect, or to be affected by, decision of the merits of this case”); cf. Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806 (holding “that a district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable ‘final decision’ ” (emphasis added)). | 3 | 1992–1999 |
Williams v. Board of County Commissioners
green
2 sentences2001“This immunity extends to law enforcement officers.” Williams v. Bd. of County Commr’s of San Juan County, 1998-NMCA-090, ¶ 22 , 125 N.M. 445 , 963 P.2d 522 . {15} In evaluating a claim of qualified immunity, we perform a two-step inquiry. 2001“This immunity extends to law enforcement officers.” Williams v. Bd. of County Commr’s of San Juan County, 1998-NMCA-090, ¶ 22 , 125 N.M. 445 , 963 P.2d 522 . {15} In evaluating a claim of qualified immunity, we perform a two-step inquiry. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Medina v. Cram
green
1 sentence2019Medina, 252 F.3d at 1128 . {8} We use a two-step analysis when evaluating a claim of qualified immunity: “(1) the defendant’s alleged conduct violated a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the conduct.” Benavidez, 2015-NMCA-065, ¶ 6 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Starko, Inc. v. Gallegos
green
1 sentence2018“The applicability of qualified immunity is a question of law that 11 we review de novo.” Starko, Inc., 2006-NMCA-085, ¶ 11 . 12 {5} In evaluating a claim of qualified immunity, we begin by examining whether 13 a violation of a constitutional right was alleged. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
green
2 sentences2001Qualified immunity is necessary to protect public officers "from undue interference with their duties and from potentially disabling threats of liability." Id. at 806 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 . {9} The United States Supreme Court has established the proper procedure in assessing a claim of qualified immunity. 2001Qualified immunity is necessary to protect public officers "from undue interference with their duties and from potentially disabling threats of liability." Id. at 806 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 . {9} The United States Supreme Court has established the proper procedure in assessing a claim of qualified immunity. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Wilson v. Layne
green
2 sentences2001"A court evaluating a claim of qualified immunity must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation." Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 609 , 119 S.Ct. 1692 , 143 L.Ed.2d 818 (1999) (quotation marks and quoted authority omitted). 2001"A court evaluating a claim of qualified immunity must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation." Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 609 , 119 S.Ct. 1692 , 143 L.Ed.2d 818 (1999) (quotation marks and quoted authority omitted). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Conn v. Gabbert
green
2 sentences1999Are Defendants Entitled to Qualified Immunity? {20} In evaluating a claim of qualified immunity we “must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.” Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286 , -, 119 S.Ct. 1292, 1295 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999). {21} In support of his contention that Defendants’ conduct violated clearly established law, Plaintiff relies on a statute and case law. 1999Are Defendants Entitled to Qualified Immunity? {20} In evaluating a claim of qualified immunity we “must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.” Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286 , -, 119 S.Ct. 1292, 1295 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999). {21} In support of his contention that Defendants’ conduct violated clearly established law, Plaintiff relies on a statute and case law. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.