federal good faith exception (New Mexico) · Go Syfert
← New Mexico issues

federal good faith exception in New Mexico

9 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Gutierrezgreen
nm · 1993 · cited in 6 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2009–2020
2 sentences

2020See Garcia, 2009-NMSC-046, ¶¶ 15, 26, 35 (holding under Article II, Section 10 that an individual is seized when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, departing from the federal test that required a person to “submit to a show of authority by law enforcement” (emphasis omitted)); see also, e.g., State v. Cordova, 1989-NMSC-083 , ¶¶ 1, 13, 17, 109 N.M. 211 , 784 P.2d 30 (departing under Article II, Section 10 from the federal test for issuance of a warrant); State v. Gutierrez, 1993-NMSC-062 , ¶¶ 1, 15 , 55, 55 n.10, 56, 116 N.M. 431 , 863 P.2d 1052 (departing under Article II, Sect

2020See Garcia, 2009-NMSC-046, ¶¶ 15, 26, 35 (holding under Article II, Section 10 that an individual is seized when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, departing from the federal test that required a person to “submit to a show of authority by law enforcement” (emphasis omitted)); see also, e.g., State v. Cordova, 1989-NMSC-083 , ¶¶ 1, 13, 17, 109 N.M. 211 , 784 P.2d 30 (departing under Article II, Section 10 from the federal test for issuance of a warrant); State v. Gutierrez, 1993-NMSC-062 , ¶¶ 1, 15 , 55, 55 n.10, 56, 116 N.M. 431 , 863 P.2d 1052 (departing under Article II, Sect

46
State v. Garciagreen
nm · 2009 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See Garcia, 2009-NMSC-046, ¶¶ 15, 26, 35 (holding under Article II, Section 10 that an individual is seized when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, departing from the federal test that required a person to “submit to a show of authority by law enforcement” (emphasis omitted)); see also, e.g., State v. Cordova, 1989-NMSC-083 , ¶¶ 1, 13, 17, 109 N.M. 211 , 784 P.2d 30 (departing under Article II, Section 10 from the federal test for issuance of a warrant); State v. Gutierrez, 1993-NMSC-062 , ¶¶ 1, 15 , 55, 55 n.10, 56, 116 N.M. 431 , 863 P.2d 1052 (departing under Article II, Sect

11
State v. Cordovagreen
nm · 1989 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020See Garcia, 2009-NMSC-046, ¶¶ 15, 26, 35 (holding under Article II, Section 10 that an individual is seized when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, departing from the federal test that required a person to “submit to a show of authority by law enforcement” (emphasis omitted)); see also, e.g., State v. Cordova, 1989-NMSC-083 , ¶¶ 1, 13, 17, 109 N.M. 211 , 784 P.2d 30 (departing under Article II, Section 10 from the federal test for issuance of a warrant); State v. Gutierrez, 1993-NMSC-062 , ¶¶ 1, 15 , 55, 55 n.10, 56, 116 N.M. 431 , 863 P.2d 1052 (departing under Article II, Sect

2020See Garcia, 2009-NMSC-046, ¶¶ 15, 26, 35 (holding under Article II, Section 10 that an individual is seized when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, departing from the federal test that required a person to “submit to a show of authority by law enforcement” (emphasis omitted)); see also, e.g., State v. Cordova, 1989-NMSC-083 , ¶¶ 1, 13, 17, 109 N.M. 211 , 784 P.2d 30 (departing under Article II, Section 10 from the federal test for issuance of a warrant); State v. Gutierrez, 1993-NMSC-062 , ¶¶ 1, 15 , 55, 55 n.10, 56, 116 N.M. 431 , 863 P.2d 1052 (departing under Article II, Sect

11
United States v. Leongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Id. ¶ 10; see also State v. Gutierrez, 1993-NMSC-062 , ¶ 1, 116 N.M. 431 , 863 P.2d 1052 (holding that evidence obtained by virtue of an invalid search warrant cannot be admitted under the exclusionary rule’s good faith exception, and declining to follow United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), which held that “when an officer’s reliance on a warrant that is later invalidated is objectively reasonable, exclusion of evidence is not necessary”). {21} In this case, the State argues that the lack of adequate notice of the April 6, 2015 hearing was a due process violation and a due process viola

11
State v. Gomezgreen
nm · 1997 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013See Gomez, 1997-NMSC-006, ¶ 20 (citing as an example of the interstitial approach State v. Gutierrez, 116 N.M. 431, 446-47 , 863 P.2d 1052, 1067-68 (1993), which declined to incorporate the federal good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule into the state constitution because refusing to apply the remedy of the exclusionary rule would undermine the purpose of the state constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures).

11
Ewing v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Mounday green
ksd · 1913
2 sentences

2023The 17 Gutierrez Court, id. ¶¶ 48-50, then utilized two cases to illustrate “the essential core” 18 of its interpretation of Article II, Section 10—United States v. MounDay, 208 F. 186 38 1 (D.

2023The Gutierrez Court, id. ¶¶ 48-50, then utilized two cases to illustrate “the essential core” of its interpretation of Article II, Section 10—United States v. MounDay, 208 F. 186 (D.

22023–2023
State v. Wagoner green
nmctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2011However, notwithstanding New Mexico's rejection of the good faith exception, "not all evidence discovered as the result of police misconduct need be suppressed." State v. Wagoner, 2001-NMCA-014, ¶ 22 , 130 N.M. 274 , 24 P.3d 306 .

2011However, notwithstanding New Mexico's rejection of the good faith exception, "not all evidence discovered as the result of police misconduct need be suppressed." State v. Wagoner, 2001-NMCA-014, ¶ 22 , 130 N.M. 274 , 24 P.3d 306 .

22011–2011
Crayton v. Commonwealth green
ky · 1992
1 sentence

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11993–1993
Jackson v. State green
ark · 1987
2 sentences

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11993–1993
State v. Sweeney green
mo · 1985
1 sentence

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11993–1993
West v. Commonwealth green
vactapp · 1993
1 sentence

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11993–1993
State v. Wilmoth green
ohio · 1986
2 sentences

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11993–1993
State v. Gutierrez green
nmctapp · 1991
2 sentences

1993Gutierrez, 112 N.M. at 780 , 819 P.2d at 1338 .

1993Gutierrez, 112 N.M. at 780 , 819 P.2d at 1338 .

11993–1993
People v. Camarella green
cal · 1991
2 sentences

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

1993Jackson v. State, 291 Ark. 98 , 722 S.W.2d 831 (001987); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63 (1991); Crayton v. Commonwealth, 846 S.W.2d 684 (Ky.1992) (petition for cert. filed); State v. Sweeney, 701 S.W.2d 420 (Mo.1985) (en banc); State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 22 OBR 427, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986); See also Ewing v. State, 613 N.E.2d 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (applying exception); West v. Commonwealth, 432 S.E.2d 730 (Va.Ct.App.1993) (holding good faith exception applies in Virginia).

11993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NM § N.M. Stat. § 39-3-3 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 17 (1991–2019) PA 9 (2009–2024) WA 9 (2003–2020) NM 9 (1993–2023) IN 7 (1991–2018) UT 4 (1991–2010) NC 3 (2017–2026) NJ 3 (2015–2019) MA 2 (1989–2014) MN 2 (2015–2016) WI 2 (2009–2012) ND 2 (1999–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check