Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Bufordgreen2 sentences2009United States v. Buford, 623 F.Supp.2d 923, 927 (M.D.Tenn.2009) (concluding that because Buford would not have mentioned the gun unless the officers had conducted an unconstitutional search, evidence of the gun should be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree); but see United States v. Grote, 2009 WL 2068023 at *3 (E.D.Wash.2009) (denying a motion for reconsideration that application of the good faith exception was merely an alternative ruling that did not constitute clear error on its part). ¶ 20 And recently, in Gonzalez, the Ninth Circuit rejected the good faith exception to the exclusio 2009United States v. Buford, 623 F. Supp. 2d 923, 927 (M.D. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Afanagreen2 sentences2019In State v. Afana, 169 Wn.2d 169, 184 , 233 P.3d 879 (2010), we rejected the federal good faith exception doctrine. 2019Our cases analyzing article I, section 7 have addressed these exceptions. ¶ 74 In State v. Afana, 169 Wash.2d 169 , 184, 233 P.3d 879 (2010), we rejected the federal good faith exception doctrine. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. White
green
2 sentences2009Ed. 2d 343 (1979). ¶19 The State acknowledges, that under State v. White, 97 Wn.2d 92, 109-10 , 640 P.2d 1061 (1982), Washington does not recognize the federal good faith exception. 2009Ed. 2d 343 (1979). ¶19 The State acknowledges, that under State v. White, 97 Wn.2d 92, 109-10 , 640 P.2d 1061 (1982), Washington does not recognize the federal good faith exception. | 4 | 2009–2019 |
State v. Afana
green
2 sentences2019In State v. Afana, 169 Wn.2d 169, 184 , 233 P.3d 879 (2010), we rejected the federal good faith exception doctrine. 2019Our cases analyzing article I, section 7 have addressed these exceptions. ¶ 74 In State v. Afana, 169 Wash.2d 169 , 184, 233 P.3d 879 (2010), we rejected the federal good faith exception doctrine. | 3 | 2018–2020 |
State v. McCormick
green
2 sentences2010State v. McCormick, 152 Wash.App. 536, 544 , 216 P.3d 475 (2009) (citing State v. White, 97 Wash.2d 92, 109-10 , 640 P.2d 1061 (1982)). 2010State v. McCormick, 152 Wn. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Werner
neutral
2 sentences2003State v. Werner, 79 Wn. 2003State v. Werner, 79 Wash.App. 872, 883-84 , 906 P.2d 342 (exclusionary rule generally applies to law enforcement, but not judges), reversed on other grounds, 129 Wash.2d 485 , 918 P.2d 916 (1996). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Riley
green
2 sentences2003State v. Werner, 129 Wn.2d 485 , 496 n.4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wn.2d 853, 857-58 , 809 P.2d 203 (1991). 2 But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. 2003State v. Werner, 129 Wn.2d 485 , 496 n.4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wn.2d 853, 857-58 , 809 P.2d 203 (1991). 2 But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Werner
green
2 sentences2003State v. Werner, 129 Wn.2d 485 , 496 n.4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wn.2d 853, 857-58 , 809 P.2d 203 (1991). 2 But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. 2003State v. Werner, 129 Wash.2d 485 , 496 n. 4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wash.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wash.2d 853, 857-58 , *203 809 P.2d 203 (1991). [2] But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Werner
green
2 sentences2003State v. Werner, 129 Wn.2d 485 , 496 n.4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wn.2d 853, 857-58 , 809 P.2d 203 (1991). 2 But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. 2003State v. Werner, 129 Wash.2d 485 , 496 n. 4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wash.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wash.2d 853, 857-58 , *203 809 P.2d 203 (1991). [2] But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Canady
green
2 sentences2003State v. Werner, 129 Wn.2d 485 , 496 n.4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wn.2d 853, 857-58 , 809 P.2d 203 (1991). 2 But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. 2003State v. Werner, 129 Wn.2d 485 , 496 n.4, 918 P.2d 916 (1996); State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 30 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993); State v. Canady, 116 Wn.2d 853, 857-58 , 809 P.2d 203 (1991). 2 But even if we did adopt the federal good faith standard as articulated by this court in Werner, the Oregon court did not issue the warrant here. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. McCormick
green
1 sentence2010State v. McCormick, 152 Wash.App. 536, 544 , 216 P.3d 475 (2009) (citing State v. White, 97 Wash.2d 92, 109-10 , 640 P.2d 1061 (1982)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Michigan v. DeFillippo
green
2 sentences2009Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31, 38 , 99 S.Ct. 2627 , 61 L.Ed.2d 343 (1979). ¶ 19 The State acknowledges that under State v. White, 97 Wash.2d 92, 109-10 , 640 P.2d 1061 (1982), Washington does not recognize the federal good faith exception. 2009Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31, 38 , 99 S.Ct. 2627 , 61 L.Ed.2d 343 (1979). ¶ 19 The State acknowledges that under State v. White, 97 Wash.2d 92, 109-10 , 640 P.2d 1061 (1982), Washington does not recognize the federal good faith exception. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.