Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. White
green
2 sentences1999State v. McNeill (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 438 , 446 ; State v. White (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 16 , 22 . 1998State v. White (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 16 , 22, 693 N.E.2d 772 , 778. | 3 | 1998–1999 |
Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Sheild
green
1 sentence2024“It is the well-settled rule that a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make.” Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 98 Ohio St.3d 77 , 2002-Ohio-7113 , 781 N.E.2d 121, ¶ 122 , quoting Lester v. Leuck, 142 Ohio St. 91, 92 , 50 N.E.2d 145 (1943); State ex rel. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Cuthbertson
green
1 sentence2024It is noted that, “a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a plea prior to sentencing.” Id. {¶21} In reviewing the court’s comments at the hearing and its judgment entry, it is apparent in the record that the court’s decision is supported by this record. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lester v. Leuck
green
2 sentences2024“It is the well-settled rule that a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make.” Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 98 Ohio St.3d 77 , 2002-Ohio-7113 , 781 N.E.2d 121, ¶ 122 , quoting Lester v. Leuck, 142 Ohio St. 91, 92 , 50 N.E.2d 145 (1943); State ex rel. 2024“It is the well-settled rule that a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make.” Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 98 Ohio St.3d 77 , 2002-Ohio-7113 , 781 N.E.2d 121, ¶ 122 , quoting Lester v. Leuck, 142 Ohio St. 91, 92 , 50 N.E.2d 145 (1943); State ex rel. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield
green
2 sentences2024“It is the well-settled rule that a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make.” Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 98 Ohio St.3d 77 , 2002-Ohio-7113 , 781 N.E.2d 121, ¶ 122 , quoting Lester v. Leuck, 142 Ohio St. 91, 92 , 50 N.E.2d 145 (1943); State ex rel. 2024“It is the well-settled rule that a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make.” Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 98 Ohio St.3d 77 , 2002-Ohio-7113 , 781 N.E.2d 121, ¶ 122 , quoting Lester v. Leuck, 142 Ohio St. 91, 92 , 50 N.E.2d 145 (1943); State ex rel. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Leonard
green
1 sentence2017In general, "debatable trial tactics do not establish ineffective assistance of counsel." State v. Leonard, 104 Ohio St.3d 54 , 2004- Ohio-6235, ¶ 146. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hendy v. Wright
neutral
1 sentence2015Summit No. 26422, 2013-Ohio-5786, ¶ 7 , this Court can review properly raised challenges to a magistrate’s impartiality. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
LaSalle Institutional Realty Advisors, L.L.C. v. Nantucket on Montgomery Road, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2014“In affidavit of disqualification proceedings, however, the question is not whether the judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct, but whether the ex parte communication demonstrates bias or prejudice on the part of the judge.” In re Disqualification of Sheward, 134 Ohio St.3d 1226 , 2012-Ohio-6289 , 982 N.E.2d 717, ¶ 12 . 2014“In affidavit of disqualification proceedings, however, the question is not whether the judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct, but whether the ex parte communication demonstrates bias or prejudice on the part of the judge.” In re Disqualification of Sheward, 134 Ohio St.3d 1226 , 2012-Ohio-6289 , 982 N.E.2d 717, ¶ 12 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Carpenter
green
2 sentences2004State v. Carpenter (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 615 , 624 , 688 N.E.2d 1090 ; State v. Mundy (1994), 99 Ohio App.3d 275 , 304 , 650 N.E.2d 502 ; State v. Gunn (Aug. 7, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16617." State v. Jones, 2002-Ohio-1780 . {¶ 82} Although Herron does not detail his objections to the prosecutor's comments, we presume that he objects to two aspects: the comments that defense counsel "made fun of" witnesses, and the prosecutor's characterization of defense arguments as smoke screens or red herrings. 2004State v. Carpenter (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 615 , 624 , 688 N.E.2d 1090 ; State v. Mundy (1994), 99 Ohio App.3d 275 , 304 , 650 N.E.2d 502 ; State v. Gunn (Aug. 7, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16617." State v. Jones, 2002-Ohio-1780 . {¶ 82} Although Herron does not detail his objections to the prosecutor's comments, we presume that he objects to two aspects: the comments that defense counsel "made fun of" witnesses, and the prosecutor's characterization of defense arguments as smoke screens or red herrings. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Mundy
green
2 sentences2004State v. Carpenter (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 615 , 624 , 688 N.E.2d 1090 ; State v. Mundy (1994), 99 Ohio App.3d 275 , 304 , 650 N.E.2d 502 ; State v. Gunn (Aug. 7, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16617." State v. Jones, 2002-Ohio-1780 . {¶ 82} Although Herron does not detail his objections to the prosecutor's comments, we presume that he objects to two aspects: the comments that defense counsel "made fun of" witnesses, and the prosecutor's characterization of defense arguments as smoke screens or red herrings. 2004State v. Carpenter (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 615 , 624 , 688 N.E.2d 1090 ; State v. Mundy (1994), 99 Ohio App.3d 275 , 304 , 650 N.E.2d 502 ; State v. Gunn (Aug. 7, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16617." State v. Jones, 2002-Ohio-1780 . {¶ 82} Although Herron does not detail his objections to the prosecutor's comments, we presume that he objects to two aspects: the comments that defense counsel "made fun of" witnesses, and the prosecutor's characterization of defense arguments as smoke screens or red herrings. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State ex rel. Wilson v. Industrial Commission
green
1 sentence1999State v. McNeill (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 438 , 446 ; State v. White (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 16 , 22 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.