Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lox, Stock & Bagels, Inc. v. Kotten MacHine Co. of California, Inc.green2 sentences1989Lox, Stock & Bagels, Inc. v. Kotten Machine Co. of California, Inc., 261 Pa.Super. 84, 87 , 395 A.2d 954, 955 (1978). 1989Lox, Stock & Bagels, Inc. v. Kotten Machine Co. of California, Inc., 261 Pa.Super. 84, 87 , 395 A.2d 954, 955 (1978). | 3 | 3 |
Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co.green2 sentences1986Lox, Stock & Bagels, Inc. v. Kotten Machine Co. of California, Inc., 261 Pa.Super. 84, 87 , 395 A.2d 954, 955 (1978) citing Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co., 417 Pa. 135, 140 , 208 A.2d 252, 255 (1965); Pa.R.C.P. 1017(b)(1). 1986Lox, Stock & Bagels, Inc. v. Kotten Machine Co. of California, Inc., 261 Pa.Super. 84, 87 , 395 A.2d 954, 955 (1978) citing Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co., 417 Pa. 135, 140 , 208 A.2d 252, 255 (1965); Pa.R.C.P. 1017(b)(1). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Broadiegreen1 sentence2025Commonwealth v. Broadie, 489 A.2d 218, 220 (Pa.Super. 1985) (citation to former rule number omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Myers, ___ A.3d ___, 2025 WL 753578 at *6 (Pa.Super. 2025) (non-precedential decision) (citing Broadie, among other cases, for the proposition that when “a trial court grants a post-sentence motion and imposes a new sentence, the -6- J-A07012-25 defendant must preserve any challenge to the discretionary aspects of the new sentence either through a second post-sentence motion or at the time of the resentencing” (citations omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Scoggins v. Scogginsgreen1 sentence2016Scoggins v. Scoggins, 382 Pa. Super. 507, 513, 555 .A.2d 1314, 1317 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Brusko v. Olshefskigreen2 sentences1994Brusko v. Olshefski, 140 Pa.Super. 485 , 13 A.2d 916, 917 (1940). 1994Brusko v. Olshefski, 140 Pa.Super. 485 , 13 A.2d 916, 917 (1940). | 1 | 1 |
Holt Hauling & Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Aronow Roofing Co.green2 sentences1992We are particularly guided by the rules laid down by this Court in Holt Hauling and Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Aronow Roofing Co., 309 Pa.Super. 158, 161-162 , 454 A.2d 1131, 1133 (1983): Where a defendant wishes to challenge the court’s exercise of in personam jurisdiction, he may do so by filing preliminary objections____ Pa.R.C.P. 1017(b)(1). 1992We are particularly guided by the rules laid down by this Court in Holt Hauling and Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Aronow Roofing Co., 309 Pa.Super. 158, 161-162 , 454 A.2d 1131, 1133 (1983): Where a defendant wishes to challenge the court’s exercise of in personam jurisdiction, he may do so by filing preliminary objections____ Pa.R.C.P. 1017(b)(1). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Landis
green
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hudock v. Donegal Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences1984Co., 438 Pa. 272 , 264 A.2d 668 (1970). 1984Co., 438 Pa. 272 , 264 A.2d 668 (1970). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.