Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1910–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Lindergreen2 sentences2009See 210 Ill. 2d R. 604(d); People v. Linder, 186 Ill. 2d 67, 74 , 708 N.E.2d 1169, 1173 (1999). 2009See 210 Ill. 2d R. 604(d); People v. Linder, 186 Ill. 2d 67, 74 , 708 N.E.2d 1169, 1173 (1999). | 2 | 2 |
Barber-Colman Co. v. a & K Midwest Insulation Co.green1 sentence2024Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co., 236 Ill. App. 3d 1065, 1073 (1992). ¶ 36 “It is well settled that where the releasing party was unaware of other claims, general releases are restricted to the specific claims contained in the release agreement. | 1 | 1 |
The PEOPLE v. Castrogreen1 sentence1976Examples of this type of substantial error are failure to instruct as to a necessary element of the crime charged (see e.g., People v. Castro, 1 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
green
2 sentences1992As the supreme court pointed out, the summary judgment motion “almost necessarily assumes that a cause of action has been stated and proceeds to determine whether there are any material issues of fact to be tried.” (Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 398, 406 , 312 N.E.2d 605, 609 .) The affidavits filed by a defendant in support of a summary judgment motion, which contest the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint, are specifically challenging the truth of these charges. 1992As the supreme court pointed out, the summary judgment motion “almost necessarily assumes that a cause of action has been stated and proceeds to determine whether there are any material issues of fact to be tried.” (Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 398, 406 , 312 N.E.2d 605, 609 .) The affidavits filed by a defendant in support of a summary judgment motion, which contest the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint, are specifically challenging the truth of these charges. | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Henderson
green
1 sentence2005Our supreme court recently addressed the issue of incomplete Rule 605(a) admonishments in People v. Henderson, 217 Ill. 2d 449 (2005). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Wilk
green
2 sentences1992(People v. Wilk (1988), 124 Ill. 2d 93, 110 , 529 N.E.2d 218, 224 .) Instead, the defendant need only file in the trial court a motion to reconsider the sentence. 1992(People v. Wilk (1988), 124 Ill. 2d 93, 110 , 529 N.E.2d 218, 224 .) Instead, the defendant need only file in the trial court a motion to reconsider the sentence. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
McNulta v. Lockridge
yellow
1 sentence1910McNulta v. Lockridge, 137 Ill. 270 ; Pa. Co. v. Chapman, 220 Ill. 428 ; Union Traction Co. v. Jerka, 227 Ill. 95 . | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Pennsylvania Co. v. Chapman
neutral
1 sentence1910McNulta v. Lockridge, 137 Ill. 270 ; Pa. Co. v. Chapman, 220 Ill. 428 ; Union Traction Co. v. Jerka, 227 Ill. 95 . | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Chicago Union Traction Co. v. Jerka
green
1 sentence1910McNulta v. Lockridge, 137 Ill. 270 ; Pa. Co. v. Chapman, 220 Ill. 428 ; Union Traction Co. v. Jerka, 227 Ill. 95 . | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.