framers clause (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

framers clause in Pennsylvania

9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1938–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Byers & Davis v. Commonwealthgreen
pa · 1862 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022It is the old right, whatever it was, the one previously enjoyed, that must remain inviolable . . . .” Byers v. Commonwealth, 42 Pa. 89, 94 (1862).

2022It is the old right, whatever it was, the one previously enjoyed, that must remain inviolable . . . .” Byers v. Commonwealth, 42 Pa. 89, 94 (1862).

22
Craig v. W. J. Thiele & Sons, Inc.green
pa · 1959 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1979–2000
2 sentences

1979Thiele & Sons, Inc., 395 Pa. 129, 134 , 149 A.2d 35, 37 (1959) controls when it states: *168 The framers of our rule must have intended to require that a transaction (in this case the making of a contract) and not merely some part of the transaction, take place in the county where venue is laid.

1979Thiele & Sons, Inc., 395 Pa. 129, 134 , 149 A.2d 35, 37 (1959) controls when it states: *168 The framers of our rule must have intended to require that a transaction (in this case the making of a contract) and not merely some part of the transaction, take place in the county where venue is laid.

12
Congregational Conference Appealgreen
pa · 1945 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1964–1964
1 sentence

1964Compare the rationale of the decision in Congregational Conference Appeal, 352 Pa. 470 , where an obviously unreasonable and impractical result required by the letter of the restrictive covenant was held not to have been within the intention thereof.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Rose green
pasuperct · 2013
2 sentences

2015In short, we consider “the original public meaning of the text at issue, giving due regard to both its spirit and the intent of the framers of the clause.” Rose, supra at 127 .

2015In short, we consider “the original public meaning of the text at issue, giving due regard to both its spirit and the intent of the framers of the clause.” Rose, supra at 127 .

32015–2015
Kelley v. Killourey neutral
conn · 1908
1 sentence

1938Killourey, supra, as likely to excite a dog to the use of its natural weapons of defense. . . .

11938–1938

Where else courts name it

PA 9 (1938–2022) CT 4 (1928–1992) HI 3 (1996–2010) CA 3 (1975–1979) MO 2 (1902–2015) OR 2 (1907–2002) OH 2 (1999–2021) NY 2 (1987–1991) FL 2 (1983–1987)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check